Building a Reflexive Space for Scientific Dialogue through the Digital Reconstruction Case of the Palais Stoclet Dining Room

Open Access

Issue		SHS Web Conf. Volume 233, 2026 17^th International Conference of the European Architectural Envisioning Association (EAEA17 2026)


Article Number		03003
Number of page(s)		12
Section		Projection Across Time
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623303003
Published online		06 July 2026

M. Murphy, E. McGovern, S. Pavía, Historic Building Information Modelling - Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 76, 89–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.11.006 [Google Scholar]
L. Martinelli, F. Calcerano, E. Gigliarelli, Methodology for an HBIM workflow focused on the representation of construction systems of built heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 55, 277–289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.03.016 [Google Scholar]
M. Lombardi, D. Rizzi, Semantic modelling and HBIM: A new multidisciplinary workflow for archaeological heritage. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 32, e00322 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2024.e00322 [Google Scholar]
A. Bosco, A. D’Andrea, M. Nuzzolo, P. Zanfagna, A BIM approach for the analysis of an archaeological monument. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLII-2-W9, 165–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-165-2019 [Google Scholar]
C. Bianchini, G. Potestà, BIM for Built Cultural Heritage: Semantic Segmentation, Architectural Stratification and LOD of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence. in Proceedings of the 2nd Brainstorming BIM conference, From Building Information Modelling to Mixed Reality, Milan, Italy, October (2019), 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49278-6_1 [Google Scholar]
E. Grilli, F. Remondino, Classification of 3D Digital Heritage. Remote Sens. 11(7), 847 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070847 [Google Scholar]
S. Parrinello, A. Dell’Amico, From Survey to Parametric Models: HBIM Systems for Enrichment of Cultural Heritage Management. in Proceedings of the 2nd Brainstorming BIM conference, From Building Information Modelling to Mixed Reality, Milan, Italy, October (2019), 89–107, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49278-6_6 [Google Scholar]
A. Favre-Brun, Architecture virtuelle et représentation de l’incertitude : analyse des solutions de visualisation de la représentation 3D: Application à l’église de la chartreuse de Villeneuve lez Avignon (Gard) et à l’abbaye Saint-Michel de Cuxa (Pyrénées-Orientales). Ph.D. thesis, Université d’Aix-Marseille, France (2013) [Google Scholar]
D. Derycke, M. Provost, Le squelette de la Maison du Peuple: Hypothèse de restitution 3D. Rev. Brux. Patrim. 22, 38–43 (2017) [Google Scholar]
C.S. Peirce, Ilustrations of the Logic of Science VI - Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis. Pop. Sci. Mon. 13, 470–482 (1878) [Google Scholar]
B. Latour, A. Yaneva, «Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move»: An ANT’s View of Architecture. Archit. Des. Theory 1, 103–111 (2017) https://doi.org/10.17454/ARDETH01.08 [Google Scholar]
Oxford English Dictionary, “Virtual, Adj. & N.”, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/3615821478 [Google Scholar]
P. Lévy, Qu’est-ce que le virtuel? (La Découverte, Paris, 1995) [Google Scholar]
R. Beacham, H. Denard, F. Niccolucci, An Introduction to the London Charter. (2006) [Google Scholar]
London Charter Initiative, The London Charter for the computer-based visualisation of cultural heritage. (2009) [Google Scholar]
International Forum of Virtual Archaeology, The Seville Principles: International Principles of Virtual Archaeology. (2012) [Google Scholar]
J.Y. Blaise, I. Dudek, Informative modelling. MIA Journal Special Issue, (2006) [Google Scholar]
F.I. Apollonio, E.C. Giovannini, A paradata documentation methodology for the Uncertainty Visualization in digital reconstruction of CH artifacts. Sci. Res. Inf. Technol. 5(1), 1–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v5n1p1 [Google Scholar]
N. Bruno, R. Roncella, A restoration oriented HBIM system for cultural heritage documentation: the case study of Parma Cathedral. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLII-2, 171–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-171-2018 [Google Scholar]
J. Sevilla, J.J. Samper, M. Fernández, A. León, Ontology and Software Tools for the Formalization of the Visualisation of Cultural Heritage Knowledge Graphs. Heritage, 6(6), 4722–4736 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6060251 [Google Scholar]
P. Maiezza, A. Tata, Standard for geometric and informative reliabilities in HBIM models. Disegnarecon 14(26), 15–15.10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.20365/disegnarecon.26.2021.15 [Google Scholar]
V. Croce, A. Manuel, G. Caroti, A. Piemonte, L. De Luca, P. Véron, Semi-automatic classification of digital heritage on the Aïoli open source 2D/3D annotation platform via machine learning and deep learning. J. Cult. Herit. 62, 187–197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.05.017 [Google Scholar]
E. Scopinaro, E. Demetrescu, S. Berto, Towards the definition of Transformation Stratigraphic Unit (TSU) as new section of the Extended Matrix methodology. Acta IMEKO, 13(3), 1–9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v13i3.1830 [Google Scholar]
D. Lo Buglio, D. Derycke, Reduce to Understand: a Challenge for Analysis and Three-dimensional Documentation of Architecture. in Proceedings of the 12th EAEA conference, Envisioning Architecture Image Perception and Communication of Heritage, Lodz, Poland, September (2015), 386–395 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.