Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2016 (ERPA 2016)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01011 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20163101011 | |
Published online | 05 September 2016 |
Research on self-esteem in decision-making and decision-making styles in orienteering athletes
1 Namık Kemal University College of Physical Education and Sports, 59000, Tekirdağ, Turkey
2 Yüzüncü Yıl University College of Physical Education and Sports, 65100, Van, Turkey
a Corresponding author: beroglu@yyu.edu.tr
The aim of this study is to examine the self-esteem in decision making and decision-making styles of orienteering athletes in terms of different variables. 157 male and 43 female orienteering athletes, making a total of 200 athletes that joined the 3rd Level of Turkey Championship in 2015 have participated in this study which is in a survey model. The data collection tools were the Melbourne Decision-making. Quastionnaire I-II and the Personal Information Form which were adapted into Turkish by Deniz (2004). In the data analysis, descriptive statics, anova, t test and Tukey test have been utilized. There is a significant difference between athletes’ marital status, age groups, experiences in orienteering sports and self-esteem in decision making, decision making styles (p<0.05). According to the research results, it has been determined that married orienteering athletes prefer both self-esteem in decision making and vigilance decision-making style more often than the single athletes that mostly prefer procrastination decision-making style. Also, it has been found out that as the athletes’ age and experiences in sports increase, selfesteem and decision-making styles are affected more positively as well.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.