Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 50, 2018
The International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences” (CILDIAH-2018)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01162 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001162 | |
Published online | 12 October 2018 |
Encyclopaedic Information in Ideographic Description of Language of Institutional Relations
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 620098 Yekaterinburg, Russia
* Corresponding author: anna.shhetinina@rsvpu.ru
The issue of including encyclopedic information in the ideographic dictionary of social vocabulary is considered in the article. The relevance of the study is due to the active functioning of the vocabulary of the institutional sphere in the modern information environment. It is noted that modern explanatory dictionaries do not provide sufficient information about the nominations of realities from the political and social spheres. Thus, lexicographical sources do not include or fragmentarily include language units that fix the original (single) historical or cultural realities. It is argued that the absence of such nominations violates the systemic nature of the representation of lexical sets that represent fragments of social reality. It is noted that the ideographic description of social vocabulary in the dictionary by means of the method of ideographic reconstruction of nominative sets allows one to represent those language units (lexemes, phraseological units, non-idiomatic compound expressions) that call facts of reality important for a person, society or state. Such facts include, among other things, proper names, the fixation of which in the dictionary is interesting from the point of view of the linguistic-creative nomination of historical phenomena, events, personalities and is necessary for the full description of social vocabulary. It is noted that language units that call historical and cultural facts can be extracted from different idioms (literary language, dialects, jargon, urban vernacular), as well as from historical and modern dictionaries. It is concluded that the description of social vocabulary, differentiated from the point of view of stylistics and time of use, will create a more objective picture of the institutional interaction of people in different periods of history.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.