Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 153, 2023
The Fifth International Conference on Social Science, Public Health and Education (SSPHE2022)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01005 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315301005 | |
Published online | 10 January 2023 |
Articles on depression in American medical websites: an analysis based on appraisal theory
School of International Studies, Harbin Institute of Technology, 150006, Harbin, China
* Corresponding author: liuleyi grace@126.com
The perfection of medical information system, the expertise and credibility of its contents are of great importance since an increasing number of people rely on online medical information. Based on Appraisal Theory, this paper selected 14 online medical articles on depression (abbreviated as OMDD) from four American medical websites (APS, Mayo Clinic, WebMD, and Everyday Health), describing the distribution of the Appraisal resources and analysing the interaction between article writers and its putative readers. The paper finds that WebMD uses many Concur resources and rhetorical questions to predict the putative readers’ “hkemindedness” with the writers. Mayo Clinic’s introduction to depression includes a lot of Dialogistic Expansive resources, suggesting that readers are “persuadable”. Everyday Health persuades readers to accept certain treatment though describing the writers’ own feelings and introducing the voice of doctors. APS employs Attributive resources to provide readers with the latest research achievements so as to encourage them to conduct further research. The articles of the four websites adopt different Appraisal strategies to realize their interpersonal meanings, which provides reference for other health communication platforms.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.