| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 228, 2026
International Conference on the Integrated Development of Education, Psychology and Media in the Digital Age (IDEPMDA 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03015 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Psychology, Media, and Society | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202622803015 | |
| Published online | 05 February 2026 | |
Cognitive Biases and Gender Opposition: Analysis from the Perspective of the Individual, Community, Society and Platforms
Asheville School, 28806 Asheville, United States
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Social media makes it possible for the public to communicate and share conceptions. As a hot online topic, gender discourse has received huge attention and discussion from different users. Cognitive biases led to the polarisation of public opinion, and gender opposites seem to become mainstream on social media. Based on social identity theory, framing theory, and cognitive bias theory, this paper explores the role of cognitive bias in social media and explains whether it amplifies gender conflict. This study argues that the dissemination of gender related issues is influenced by preconceived cognitive frameworks, leading to biases in public interpretation. These individual cognitive biases exacerbate the opposite of gender discourse, and are amplified on social media. From an interdisciplinary perspective of psychology and gender studies, cognitive biases influence public conceptions and attitudes towards gender issues. This study not only provides a theoretical explanation for understanding gender opposites on social media but also offers insights for platform governance and public opinion guidance.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

