EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 (2012) SHS Web of Conferences, 2 (2012) 00019 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 2, 2012
3rd International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE –1st Congress of Rehabilitation Doctors of Latvia
Article Number 00019
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20120200019
Published online 17 October 2012
  1. Anusavice, K.J., Benn, D.K. (2001) Time to change state and regional dental licensure board exams in response to evidence from caries research? CROMB, 12, p. 368–372. DOI: 10.1177/10454411010120050101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berzina, S., Care, R. (2003) Dental health in 11 and 13 year old children in Latvia. Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 5, p. 62–64. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brathall, D., Hänsel-Peterson, G. (2005) Cariogram – a multifactorial risk assessment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 33, p. 256–264. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brukiene, V., Aleksejuniene, J., Balciuniene, I. (2005) Dental restorations quality in Lithuanian adolescents. Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 7(4), p. 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke, F.J.T., Lucarotti, P.S.K., Holder, R. (2005) Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 4): Influence of time and place. Journal of Dentistry, 33, p. 837–847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elderton, R.J. (1990) Clinical studies concerning re-restoration of teeth. ADR, 4, p. 4–9. DOI:10.1177/08959374900040010701. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fedorowicz, Z., Nasser, M., Wilson, N. (2009) Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration, 4, p. 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldberg, A.J. (1990) Deterioration of restorative materiāls and the risk for secondary caries. ADR, 4, p. 14–18. DOI: 10.1177/08959374900040010201. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gudkina, J, Brinkmane, A. (2008) Caries experience in relation to oral hygiene, salivary cariogenic microflora, buffer capacity and secretion rate in 6-year olds and 12 year olds in Riga. Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 10, p. 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  10. Henkuzena, I., Care, R., Rogovska, I. (2004) Dental status among 2-6 year old children in Riga city, Latvia. Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 6, p. 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hewlett, E.R., Atchison, K.A., White, S.C., Flack, V. (1993) Radiographic secondary caries prevalence in teeth with clinically defective restorations. J Dent Res, 72, p. 1604–1608. DOI: 10.1177/00220345930720121301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hickel, R., Peschke, A., Tyas, M., MjörI. (2010) FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations – update and clinical examples. Clinical Oral Investigations, 14(4), p. 349. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kidd, E.A.M. (1990) Caries diagnosis within restored teeth. ADR, 4, p. 10–13. DOI: 10.1177/08959374900040010101. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kidd, E.A.M., O’Hara, J.W. (1990) The caries status of occlusal amalgam restorations with marginal defects. J Dent Res, 69, p. 1275–1277. DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690061001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirkevang, L.L., Vaeth, M. (2009) Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population. Caries Res, 43, p. 286–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kroeze, H.J.P., Plasschaert, A.J.M., van’t HofM.A., Truin, G.J. (1990) Prevalence and need for replacement of amalgam and composite restorations in Dutc adults. J Dent Res, 69, p. 1270–1274. DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690060901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kubo, S. (2011) Longevity of resin composite restorations. Japanese Dental Science Review, 47, p. 43–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mendes, F.M., Braga, M.M., Oliveira, L.B., Antunes, J.L., Ardenghi, T.M., Bönecker, M. (2010) Discriminant validity of the International Caries Detection System (ICDAS) and comparability with World Health Organization criteria in a cross-sectional study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 38, p. 398–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Opdam, N.J.M., Bronkhorst, E.M., Cenci, M.S., Huysmans, M.-C. D.N.J.M., Wilson, N.H.F. (2011) Age of failed restorations: A deceptive longevity parameter. Journal of Dentistry, 39, p. 225–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Opdam, N.J.M., Loomans, B.A.C., Roeters, F.J.M., Bronkhorst, E.M. (2004) Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. Journal of Dentistry, 32, p. 379–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ozer, L., Thylsstrup, A. (1995) What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A Review. ADR, 9, p. 394–402. DOI: 10.1177/08959374950090040901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Papagiannoulis, L., Kakaboura, A., Eliades, G. (2002) In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materiāls. Dental Materials, 18, p. 561–569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pitts, N.B. (2001) Clinical diagnosis of dental caries: a European perspective. J Dent Edu, 65, p. 972–978. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pitts, N.B. (2009) Introduction. How the detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries integrate with personalized caries management. In Pitts, N.B. (ed.), Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries. Monogr Oral Sci. (p. 1–14). Basel, Karger. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rence-Bambite, I., Berzina, S., Care, R. (2003) Dynamics of Caries Development in Teenagers with High Caries Intensity. RSU Research Articles in Medicine and Pharmacy, p. 416–422. [Google Scholar]
  26. Riley, J.L. III, Gordan, V.V., Rouisse, K.M., McClelland, J., Gilbert, G.H. (2011) Differences in male and female dentist’ practice patterns regarding diagnosis and treatment of dental caries. JADA, 142(4), p. 429–440. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sarrett, D.C. (2005) Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dental Materials, 21, p. 9–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scholtanus, J.D., Huysmans, M.-C. D.N.J.M. (2007) Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscosus glass-ionomer material over 6-year period: A restorative study. Journal of Dentistry, 35, p. 156–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sharif, M.O., Merry, A., Catleugh, M., Tickle, M., Brunton, P., Dunny, S.M., Aggarwal, V.R. (2010) Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2, p. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  30. Silness, J., Löe, H. (1964) Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand, 22, p. 121–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Söderholm, K.-J.M., Tyas, M.J., Jokstad, A. (1998) Determinants of quality in operative dentistry. CROMB, 9, p. 464–479. DOI: 10.1177/10454411980090040501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg, K., Dijken, J.W.V., Funegård, U., Lindberg, A., Nilsson, M. (2009) Selections of dental materiāls and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in nothern Sweden. Journal of Dentistry, 37, p. 673–678. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Topping, G.V.A., Pitts, N.B. (2009) Clinical visual caries detection. In Pitts, N.B. (ed.), Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries. Monogr Oral Sci. (p. 15–41). Basel, Karger. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Nieuwenhuysen, J.-P., D’Hoore, W., Carvalho, J., Qvist, V. (2003) Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. Journal of Dentistry, 31, p. 395–405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.