EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2014) SHS Web of Conferences, 10 (2014) 00030 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 10, 2014
4th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY, HEALTH, WELFARE
Article Number 00030
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141000030
Published online 09 September 2014
  1. Attree, E., Turner, M. J., & Cowell, N. (2009).A virtual reality test identifies the visuospatial strengths of adolescents with dyslexia. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12 (2), 163–168 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683–696 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., & Snyder, L. E. (2006). Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 835–853 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., & McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference. The Journal of Special Education, 40 (2), 103–114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jimenez, J. E., Siegel, L. S., & Lopez, M. R. (2003). The Relationship between IQ and reading disabilities in English-speaking Canadian and Spanish children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36 (1), 15–23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., Van der Broek, P., Mischinski, M. Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revisions on more – and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (4), 525–556 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paeglis, R. (2010). Movements of eyes in real tasks. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  9. Paeglis, R., Gorshanova, I., Bagucka K., & Lacis, I. (2008). Latvian and Russian textbooks: eye movements in reading text formatted in two columns. In J. Spigulis, A. Krumins, D. Millers, A. Sternberg, I. Muzikante, A. Ozols, M. Ozolinsh (Eds.). Sixth International Conference on Advanced Optical Materials and Devices (AOMD-6), Rīga, Latvia. Proceedings of SPIE, 7142, 19 [Google Scholar]
  10. Paeglis, R., Bagucka, K., Gorshanova, I., & Balgalve, A. (2009). Eye movement patterns and reading speed in two highly inflected languages written with different alphabets. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 4, 15–22 [Google Scholar]
  11. Paeglis, R., Orlovska, M., & Bluss, Kr. (2011). Color stabilizes textbook visual processing. In F. Baldini, J. Homola, R. A. Lieberman, & K. Kalli (Eds.). Optical sensors 2011; and photonic crystal fibers V, Prague, Czech Republic. Proceedings of SPIE, 8073, 16 [Google Scholar]
  12. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Raščevska M., & Sebre S. (2008). Latvian edition of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Univeristy of Latvia, EPF Department of Psychology, unpublished material [Google Scholar]
  14. Raščevska, M., Paegle, Dz., & Mencis, J. (2010). Assessments manual of Latvian language and maths achievement test. Rīga: LU Academic publishing [Google Scholar]
  15. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stage, S. A., Abbott, R. D., Jenkins, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ–word reading discrepancy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24–33 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tilstra, J., Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32 (4), 382–401 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vakil, E., Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D., Weiss, I., & Arzuoan, Y. (2011). Analogies solving by individuals with and without intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32 (2), 846–856 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Van der Schoot, M., Vasbinder, A. L., Horsley, T. M., & Van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2008). The role of two reading strategies in text comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 31 (2), 203– 223 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation [Google Scholar]
  22. Winner, E., Von Karolyi, C., Malinsky, D., French, L., Seliger, C., Ross, E., & Weber, C. (2001). Dyslexia and visual-spatial talents compensation vs deficit model. Brain & Language, 76, 81–110 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.