Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 12, 2014
4th International Conference on Tourism Research (4ICTR)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01069 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141201069 | |
| Published online | 19 November 2014 | |
- M. V. Lupke-Schwarz, (2013). A brief history of travel: from elite hobby to mass tourism. Retrieved from http://www.dw.de/a-brief-history-of-travel-from-elite-hobby-to-mass-tourism/a-16996047 August 9, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- B. Neuts & P. Nijkamp, Crowding perception in a tourist city: a question of preference. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2011-140/3 (2011) [Google Scholar]
- G. J. Inglis, V. I. Johnson, & F. Ponte, Crowding norms in marine settings: a case study of snorkeling on the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Management 24, 3, 369–381 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tourism Intelligence International (2008). The paradigm shift in travel and tourism. Retrieved from http://tourism-intelligence.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=265 August 7, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- X. R. Li & J. F. Petrick, Tourism marketing in an era of paradigm shift. Journal of Travel Research 46, 235–245 (2007) [Google Scholar]
- M. Alexander, Access, tourism and recreation. Management Planning for Nature Conservation, 273–314 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Y. Ahn, B. K. Lee, & S. Shafer, Operationalizing sustainability in regional tourism planning: an application of the limits of acceptable change framework. Tourism Management 23, 1 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. B. Ditton, A. J. Fedler, & A. R. Grafe, Factors contributing to perceptions of recreational crowding. Leisure Sciences 5, 4, 273–288 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Arnberger, & W. Haider, Social effects on crowding preferences of urban forest visitors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 3, 125–136 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Arnberger, & C. Brandenburg, Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions and use displacement of visitor groups to Peri-Urban National Park. Environment Management 40, 34–45 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Han, B. G.C. Dellaert, W. F. V. Raiij, & H. J. P. Timmermans, Visitors’ strategic anticipation of crowding in scarce recreational resources. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 17, 449–456 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Doorne, Caves, cultures and crowds: carrying capacity meets consumer sovereignty. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8, 2, 116–130 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Neuts & P.Nijkamp, Tourist crowding perception and acceptability in cities: an applied modeling study on Bruges. Annals of Tourism Research 39, 4, 2133–2153 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Tarrant, H. K. Cordell & T. L. Kibler, Measuring perceived crowding for high-density river recreation: the effects of situational conditions and personal factors. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 19, 2, 97–112 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Santana-Jimenez & J. M. Hernandez, Estimating the effect of overcrowding on tourist attraction: the case of Canary Islands. Tourism Management 32, 415–425 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Pettebone, B. Meldrum, C. Leslie, S. R. Lawson, P. Newman, N. Reigner & A. Gibson, A visitor use monitoring approach on the Half Dome cables to reduce crowding and inform park planning decisions in Yosemite National Park. Landscape and Urban Planning 118, 1–9 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Tarrant, Variability of the perceived crowding scale: a research note. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 21, 2, 157–164 (2010) [Google Scholar]
- R. E. Manning, W. A. Valliere & B. Wang, Crowding norms: alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 21, 2, 97–115 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.