EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 23 (2016) SHS Web of Conferences, 23 (2016) 02004 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 23, 2016
PSU-USM-NSTRU 2014 International Conference on Arts and Sciences 2014 “Arts and Sciences Research 2014: Spot of Change for Tomorrow”
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 24
Section Tourism, Economy and Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162302004
Published online 06 January 2016
  1. Abu Zharin, H. and Bujang, A. A. (1999), Factors influencing demand for condominium In Johor Bahru, Malaysia. International Real Estate Society 1999 (IRESC ‘99): Mandarin Oriental, Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahlfeldt, G. M. and Kavetsos, G. (2014), ‘Form or function? The impact of new sports stadia on property prices in London’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society ), 177 (1), pp. 169–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahlfeldt, G. M. and Maennig, W. (2008), ‘Impact of sports arenas on land values: Evidence from Berlin’. The Annals of Regional Science, 44 (2), pp. 205–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahlfeldt, G. M. and Maennig, W. (2010), ‘Stadium architecture and urban development from the perspective of urban economics’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34 (3). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alonso, W. (1964), Location and Land Use: Towards a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Anas, A., Arnott, R. and Small, J.A. (1998), ‘Urban of spatial structure’. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 1426–1464. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Banister, D. (2007), Qualification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment , [online], Available: www.tsu.ox.ac.uk/research/pubs/1029-banister.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bender, B. and Hwang, H. (1985), ‘Hedonic housing price indices and secondary employment centers’. Journal of Urban Economics, 17, pp. 90–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S., and Charlton, M. (1996), ‘Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial non-statianary’. Geographical Analysis, 28, pp. 281–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Calvo, E. and Escolar, M. (2003), The local voter: A geographically weighted approach to ecological inference. American Journal of Political Science, 47 (1), pp. 189–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carruthers, J. I. and Clark, D. (2009), ‘Valuing environmental quality: A space-based strategy’. Journal of Regional Science. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chin, T. L. and Chau, K. W. (2003), A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model’. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 27 (2), pp. 145–165. [Google Scholar]
  14. Clapp, J. M. and Giaccotto, C. (1998), Residential hedonic models: A rational expectations approach to age effects’. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, pp. 415–437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Conroy, S. J. dan Milosch, J. L. (2011), ‘An estimation of the coastal premium for residential housing prices in San Diego County’. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 42, pp. 211–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Conroy, S., Narwold, A, and Sandy, J. (2013), ‘The value of a floor: valuing floor level in high rise condominiums in San Diego’. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 6 (2), pp. 197–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Crespo, R. and Grêt-Regamey, A. (2013), ‘Local hedonic house-price modelling for urban planners: advantages of using local regression techniques’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 40 (4), pp. 664–682. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Crompton, J. L. (2001), ‘The impact of parks on property values: A review of empirical evidence’. Journal of Leisure Research, 33 (1), pp. 1–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D’Ouville, E. L. and McDonald, J. F. (1988), ‘Constraints on land consumption and urban rent gradients’. Journal of Urban Economics, 24. [Google Scholar]
  20. Day, B., Bateman, I. and Lake, I. (2007), ‘Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model’. Environ Resource Econ, 37, pp. 211–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Department of Statistics Malaysia (1980), The Malaysia Population and Housing Census. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  22. Department of Statistics Malaysia (2010), The Malaysia Population and Housing Census. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  23. Do, A.Q. and Grunditski, G. (1995), ‘Golf-course and residential house prices: An empirical examination’. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10 (3), pp. 261–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Du, H. and Mulley, C. (2006), ‘Relationship between transport accessibility and land value: Local model approach with geographically weighted regression’. Transportation Research Record, 1977 (1), pp. 197–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dubin, R. A. dan Sung, C. H. (1990), ‘Specification of hedonic regressions: Non-nested tests on measures of neighborhood quality’. Journal of Urban Economics, 27, pp. 97–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dziauddin, M. F., Powe, N. and Alvanides, S. (2015), Estimating the effects of light rail transit (LRT) system on residential property values using geographically weighted regression (GWR). Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 8, pp. 1–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fletcher, M., Gallimore, P. and Mangan, J. (2000), ‘Heteroscedasticity in hedonic price models’. Journal of Property Research, 17 (2), pp. 93–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Forrest, D., Glen, J., Grime, J. and Ward, R. (1996), ‘House price changes in greater Manchester 1990-1993 and the impact of metro link’. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 30 (1), pp. 15–29. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C. and Charlton, M. (2002), Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fujita, M. (1989), Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. Cambridge: Cambride University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Garreau, J. (1991), Edge City. New York: Dounleday. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gibbons, S. (2014), Gone with the wind: Valuing the visual impact of the wind turbines through house prices. Serc paper discussion: London School of Economics and Political Sciences & Spatial Economics Research Centre. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2003), ‘Valuing English primary schools’. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, pp. 197–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hanham, R. M., Hoch, R. J. and Spiker, J. S. (2009), The Spatially Varying Relationship Between Local Land-Use Policies And Urban Growth: A Geographically Weighted Regression. In: Gatrell, J. D. and Jensen, R. R. (eds.), Planning and Sosioeconomic Applications. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, pp. 43–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hess, D. B. and Almeida, T. M. (2006), Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo. Transportation research board 85th Annual Meeting: National Research Council, Washinton DC. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hess, D. B. and Almeida, T. M. (2007), ‘Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York’. Urban Studies, 44 (5-6), pp. 1041–1068. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jim, C.Y. and Chen, W.Y. (2009), ‘Value of scenic views: Hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong’. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jones, K. and Bullen, N. (1993), ‘A multilevel analysis of the variations in domestic property prices: Southern England 1980-1987’. Urban Studies, 30 (8), pp. 1409–1426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lansford, N. H., and Jones, L. L. (1995), ‘Recreational and aesthetic value of water using hedonic price analysis’. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 20 (2), pp. 341–355. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lazrak, F., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. and Rouwendal, J. (2014). ‘The market value of cultural heritage in urban areas: An application of spatial hedonic pricing’. Journal of Geographical Systems, 16, pp. 89–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lehner, M. (2011), Modelling House Prices in Singapore Applying Hedonic Spatial Regression. Master Thesis (unpublished), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. [Google Scholar]
  42. Luo, J. and Wei, Y.H.D. (2009), ‘Modeling spatial variations of urban growth patterns in Chinese cities: The case of Nanjing’. Landscape and Urban Planning. 91 (2), pp. 51–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Malpezzi, S. (2002), Hedonic Pricing Models and House Price Indexes: A Select Review. In Kenneth Gibb and Anthony O’Sullivan (eds.), Housing Economics and Public Policy: Essays in Honour of Duncan Maclennan. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 67–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. McCord, M., Davis, P.T., Haran, M., McGreal, S. and Mcllhatton, D. (2012), ‘Spatial variation as a determinant of house price: Incorporating a geographically weighted regression approach within the Belfast housing market’. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 17 (1), pp. 49–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. McDonald, J.F. (1979), Economic Analysis of an Urban Housing Market Studies in Urban Economics. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  46. McMullen, B. A. (2011), The Economic Impacts of Parks on Residential Property Values: Evidence from Gainesville, Florida. Master Thesis (unpublished), University of Florida. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mills, E. and Simenauer, R. (1996), ‘New hedonic estimates of regional constant quality house prices’. Journal of Urban Economics, 39, pp. 209–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mills, E. S. (1972), Urban Economics. Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mitchell, D. (2000), Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mohamad, J. and Kiggundu, A.T. (2007), ‘The rise of the private car in Kuala Lumpur: Assessing the policy option’. IATSS Research, 31 (1), pp. 69–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mohd Shariff, N. and Rainis, R. (2009), Modelling Urban Spatial Structure using Geographically Weighted Regression. 18th World IMACS congress and MODSIM09 international congress on modelling and simulation: The Australian National University. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mok, H.M.K., Chan, P.P.K. and Cho, Y.S. (1995), ‘A hedonic price model for private properties in Hong Kong’, Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 10, pp. 37–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mulley, C. (2014), ‘Accessibility and residential land value uplift: Identifying spatial variations in the accessibility impacts of a bus transitway’, Urban Studies, 51 (8), pp. 1707–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and housing: The Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nakaya, T., Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M. and Brunsdon, C. (2009), Semiparametric geographically weighted generalised linear modelling in GWR 4.0. In Lees, B. and Laffan, S. (eds.), 10th International Conference on GeoComputation: UNSW Sydney, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  56. Orford, S. (1999). Valuing The Built Environment: GIS and House Price Analysis. England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  57. Powe, N.A., Garrod, D., Willis K.G. (1995), ‘Valuation of urban amenities using an hedonic price model’. Journal of Property Research, 12, pp. 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  58. Powe, N.A., Garrod, G.D., Brunsdon, C.F. and Willis, K.G. (1997), ‘Using a geographic information system to estimate an hedonic price model of the benefits of woodland access’. Forestry, 70 (2), pp. 139–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Richardson, H.W., Vipond, J. and Furbey, R.A. (1974), ‘Determinants of urban house prices’. Urban Studies, 11, pp. 189–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rosen, S. (1974), ‘Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competitions’. Journal of Political Economy, 72, pp. 34–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sirmans, G. S., and Macpherson, D. (2003), ‘The State of affordable housing’. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 11 (2), 131–156. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sunak, Y. and Madlener, R. (2012), The Impact of Wind Farms on Property Values: A Geographically Weighted Hedonic Pricing Model. FCN Working Paper No. 3/2012 (revised March 2013). [Google Scholar]
  63. Theebe, M. A. J. (2004), ‘Palnes, trains and automobiles: The impact of traffic noise on house prices’. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 28 (2/3), pp. 209–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tu, C.C. (2005), ‘How does a new sports stadium affect housing values? The case of FedEx field’. Land Economics, 81 (3), pp. 379–395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tyrvainen, L. (1997), ‘The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonic pricing method’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37 (3), pp. 211–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vandegrift, D. and Lahr, M. (2011), ‘Open space, house prices, and the tax base’. The Annals of Regional Science, 46 (1), pp 83–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wang, K., Chan, S. H. and Yang, J. (2011). ‘A rational explanation for boom-and-bust price patterns in real estate markets’. International Real Estate Review, 14 (3), pp. 257–282. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang, K., Erikson, J. and Chan, S.H. (1995), ‘Does the REIT stock market resemble the general stock market?’. Journal of Real Estate Research, 10 (4), pp. 445–460. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wilhelmsson, M. (2000). ‘The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 43 (6): pp. 799–815. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yearbook Statistics of Malaysia (1984), Department of Statistics: Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yearbook Statistics of Malaysia (2010), Department of Statistics: Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.