EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 27 (2016) SHS Web of Conferences, 27 (2016) 05010 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 05010
Number of page(s) 14
Section Lexique(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162705010
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Bernier-Colborne, G. & M.C. L’Homme (2015). Using a distributional neighbourhood graph to enrich semantic frames in the field of the environment. In Actes de la 10e conférence internationale Terminology and Artificial Intelligence (TIA’15), Granada, Spain, 9-16. [Google Scholar]
  2. DiCoEnviro. Dictionnaire fundamental de l’environnement (http://olst.ling.umontreal.ca/cgi-bin/dicoenviro/search.cgi). Page consultée le 10 mars 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dolbey, A., M. Ellsworh & J. Scheffczyk (2006). BioFrameNet: A Domain-specific FrameNet Extension with Links to Biomedical Ontologies. KR-MED 2006 Biomedical Ontology in Action, Baltimore, Maryland. [Google Scholar]
  4. Drouin, P. (2003). Term Extraction Using Non-Technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage. Terminology 9(1), 99-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. EIONET, GEMET Thesaurus (http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/). Page consultée le 23 novembre 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Envo. Environmental Ontology (http://environmentontology.org/). Page consultée le 23 novembre 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Faber, P. (ed.) (2012). A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fillmore, C.J. (1976). Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. In Annals New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech 280, 20-32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fillmore, C.J., & B.T. Akins (1992). Toward a Frame-based Lexicon: The Semantics of risk and its Neighbors. In A. Lehrer and E. Kittay (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 75-102. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fillmore, C.J. & Collin Baker (2010). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine and Haiko Narrog (eds), Oxford : Oxford University Press, 313-339. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fillmore, C, M.R.L. Petruck, J. Roppenhofer & A. Wright (2003). FrameNet in Action: The Case of Attaching. International Journal of Lexicography 16(2), 297-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Framed DiCoEnviro. A Framed Version of DiCoEnviro (http://olst.ling.umontreal.ca/dicoenviro/framed/index.php). Page consultée le 10 mars 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. FrameNet (https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/home). Page consultée le 23 novembre 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. IATE, Interactive Terminology for Europe (http://iate.europa.eu/SearchByQueryLoad.do?method=load). Page consultée le 23 novembre 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ingrosso, F. & A. Polguère (2015). How Terms Meet in Small-World Lexical Networks: The Case of Chemistry Terminology. Proceedings of the Conference Terminology and Artificial Intelligence 2015, 167-171. [Google Scholar]
  16. L’Homme, M.C. (2012a). Le verbe terminologique : un portrait de travaux récents. In Neveu, F. et al. (éd.). Actes du 3e Congrès mondial de linguistique française, Lyon, France, EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  17. L’Homme, M.C. (2012b). Using ECL (Explanatory Combinatorial Lexicology) to discover the lexical structure of specialized subject fields, In Apresjan, J. et al. (eds.). Words, Meanings and other Interesting Things. A Festschrift n Honour of the 80th Anniversary of Professor Igor Alexandrovic Mel’cuk, Moscow: RCK, 378-390. [Google Scholar]
  18. L’Homme, M.C. (2015). Découverte de cadres sémantiques dans le domaine de l’environnement : le cas de l’influence objective. Terminàlia 12, 29-40. [Google Scholar]
  19. L’Homme, M.C, B. Robichaud & C. Subirats (2014). Discovering frames in specialized domains, In Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lerat, P. (2002). Qu’est-ce que le verbe spécialisé ? Le cas du droit. Cahiers de Lexicologie 80, 201-211. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mel’čuk. I., A. Clas et A. Polguère (1995). Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et comibinatoire, Louvain-la-Neuve : Duculot. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pimentel, J. (2010). Description de verbes juridiques au moyen de la sémantique des cadres, Terminologie & Ontologie : Théories et applications (Toth 2011), Annecy 2011, 26-27 mai 2011. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pimentel, J. (2013). Methodological Bases for Assigning Terminological equivalents. A Contribution. Terminology 19(2), 237-257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Polguère, A. (2012). Propriétés sémantiques et combinatoires des quasi-prédicats sémantiques. Scolia 26, 131-152. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruppenhofer, J, M. Ellsworth, M. Petruck, C. Johnson & J. Scheffczyk (2010). FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice (http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu). Page consultée le 30 novembre 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmidt, T. (2009). The Kicktionary – A Multilingual Lexical Resources of Football Language. In Boas, H.C. (ed). Multilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography. Methods and Applications, Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter, 101-134. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tellier, C. (2008). Verbes spécialisés en corpus médical : une méthode de description pour la rédaction d’articles terminographiques, Travail dirigé présenté au Département de linguistique et de traduction, Université de Montréal. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wandji, O., M.C. L’Homme and N. Grabar (2013). Discovery of Semantic Frames for a Contrastive Study of Verbs in Medical Corpora. Terminology and Artificial Intelligence, TIA 2013, Paris. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.