Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 09002
Number of page(s) 14
Section Phonétique, Phonologie et Interfaces
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162709002
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Archibald, J. (1998). Second language phonology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, Timing and the Timing of Rhythm. Phonetica 66, 46–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baran, J.A., Laufer, M.Z. & Daniloff, R. (1977). Phonological contrastivity in conversation: A comparative study of Voice Onset Time. Journal of Phonetics 5, 339–350. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardel, C. & Falk, Y. (2012). Behind the L2 status factor: A neurolinguistic framework for L3 research. Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn & J. Rothman (eds), 61–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version 5.3) [Computer software]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2012). L3 phonology: An understudied domain. Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn & J. Rothman (eds), 33–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabrelli Amaro, J., Amaro, J.F. & Rothman, J. (2015). The relationship between L3 transfer and structural similarity across development. Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development, H. Peukert (ed), 21–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, C. B., Yao, Y., Haynes, E. F. & Rhodes, R. 2011. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 3964–3980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chao, K.-Y. & Chen, L.-M. 2008. A cross-linguistic study of Voice Onset Time in stop consonant productions. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing 13, 215–232. [Google Scholar]
  10. Duanmu, S. 2007. The phonology of standard Chinese. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eckman, F.R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27, 315–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fellbaum, M.L. (1986). Markedness and allophonic rules. Markedness. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Linguistics Symposium of the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, March 11–12, 1983, F.R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcik & J. R. Wirth (eds), 291–308. New York: Plenum Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1979). Zu den deutschen Verschlußlauten und Affrikaten. Sprache und Sprechen. Festschrift für Eberhard Zwirner zum 80. Geburtstag, K. Ezawa & K.H. Rensch (eds), 79–100. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Google Scholar]
  14. Flege, J. 1981. The phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 15, 443–455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Flege, J. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in cross-language research. W. Strange (ed), 233–277. Baltimore: York Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Flynn, S., Foley, C. & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition. Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism 1, 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabriel, C., Stahnke, J. & Thulke, J. (2014). On the acquisition of French speech rhythm in a multilingual classroom: Evidence from linguistic and extra-linguistic data. Actes du 4e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. Berlin, 19-23 juillet 2014. Recueil des résumés CD-ROM des actes. F. Neveu, L. Hriba, A. Gerstenberg, J. Meinschaefer & S. Prévost (eds), 1267–1283. Paris: Institut de linguistique française / EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gabriel, C., Stahnke, J. & Thulke, J. (2015). Acquiring English and French speech rhythm in a multilingual classroom: A comparison with Asian Englishes. Universal or diverse paths to English phonology? U. Gut, R. Fuchs & E.-M. Wunder (eds), 135–163. Berlin: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grabe, E. & Low, E.L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in laboratory phonology 7, N. Warner & C. Gussenhoven (eds), 515–546. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gut, U. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism 7, 19–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hermas, A. (2014). Multilingual transfer: L1 morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies 8, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kessinger, R.H. & Blumstein, S.E. (1997). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 143-168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kupisch, T., Snape, N. & Stangen, I. (2013). Foreign language acquisition in heritage speakers: The acquisition of articles in L3-English by German-Turkish bilinguals. Linguistic Superdiversity in Urban Areas: Research approaches, J. Duarte & I. Gogolin (eds), 99-122. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lein, T., Kupisch, T. & van de Weijer, J. (2016). Voice Onset Time production in adult simultaneous bilinguals (German-French) and the role of childhood. International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI: 10.1177/1367006915589424 [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, F. (2013). The effect of speakers’ sex on voice onset time in Mandarin stops. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 133, 142-147. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin, H. & Wang, Q. (2007). Mandarin rhythm: An acoustic study. Journal of Chinese Linguistics and Computing 17, 127-140. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lin, Y.-H. (2007). The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lisker, L. & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20, 384–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Llama, R., Cardoso, W. & Collins, L. (2010). The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology, International Journal of Multilingualism 7, 39-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H. & Kupisch, T. (2016). Transfer into L3 English: Global accent in German dominant heritage speakers of Turkish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI: 10.1075/lab.15013.llo [Google Scholar]
  32. Marx, N. & Mehlhorn, G. (2010). Pushing the positive: Encouraging phonological transfer from L2 to L3. International Journal of Multilingualism 7, 4-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Montrul, S. (2016). The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Odlin, T. (1989). Language Transfer. Cambridge: CUP. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-Linguistic Influence. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 436–486. London: Blackwell. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramus, F., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265-292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rothman, J. (2010). On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching 28, 245-273. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research 27, 107-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rück, N. (2011). Are migrant children the better learners of French? About monolinguals and plurilinguals in the foreign language classroom. Towards multilingualism and the inclusion of cultural diversity, I. Florio-Hansen (ed), 75-97. Kassel: Kassel University Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sağin Şimşek, S. Ç. (2006). Third language acquisition: Turkish-German bilingual students’ acquisition of English word order in a German educational setting. Münster: Waxmann. [Google Scholar]
  41. Siemund, P. & Lechner, S. (2015). Transfer effects in the acquisition of English as an additional language by bilingual children in Germany. Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development, H. Peukert (ed), 147-160. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  42. Splendido, Frida (2014). Le développement d aspects phonético-phonologiques du français chez des enfants bilingues simultanés et successifs. Le VOT et la liaison dans une étude de cas multiples (Études Romanes de Lund 92). Lund: Lunds Universitet. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stock, D. (1971). Untersuchungen zur Stimmhaftigkeit hochdeutscher Phonemrealisationen. Hamburg: Buske. [Google Scholar]
  44. Thiele, S. (2015). Was ist französisch an türkisch du? Allochthone Mehrsprachigkeit im Fremdsprachenunterricht nutzen. Herkunftsbedingte Mehrsprachigkeit im Unterricht der romanischen Sprachen, E.M. Fernández Ammann, A. Kropp & J. Müller-Lancé (eds), 137-157. Berlin: Frank & Timme. [Google Scholar]
  45. Valdés, G. (2000). Teaching heritage languages: An introduction for Slavic-language-teaching professionals. In earning and teaching of Slavic languages and cultures: Toward the 21st century, O. Kagan & B. Rifkin (eds), 375–403. Bloomington: Slavica. [Google Scholar]
  46. Van de Weijer, J. & Kupisch, T. (2015). Voice onset time in heritage speakers and second-language speakers of German. Paper presentated at the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015, 7–10 September. Chania, Greece. [Google Scholar]
  47. White, L. & Mattys, S.L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 501-522. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wiese, R. (1996). The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.