Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 09003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Phonétique, Phonologie et Interfaces
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162709003
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (Producer). (1992-2011). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. [Google Scholar]
  2. Crothers, J. (1978). Typology and universals of vowel systems. In J. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language (Vol. 2). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 93-152. [Google Scholar]
  3. Delattre, P. (1951). The Physiological Interpretation of Sound Spectograms. PMLA, 66(5), 864-875. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delattre, P. (1961). Le jeu des transitions de formants et la perception des consonnes. Proc. of the 4th Int. Cong. Phon. Sciences, Helsinki, 407-417. [Google Scholar]
  5. Delattre, P. (1969). An Acoustic and Articulatory Study of Vowel Reduction in Four Languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 7(4), 295-324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Mareüil, P. B., Adda-Decker, M. & Woehrling, C. (2010). Antériorisation/aperture des voyelles /O/~/o/ en français du Nord et du Sud. Proc. of the 28es Journées d’Étude sur la Parole, Mons, 81-84. [Google Scholar]
  7. Durand, P. (1985). Variabilité acoustique et invariance en français: consonnes occlusives et voyelles. Paris: CNRS. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fant, G. (1960). The Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  9. Flemming, E. (2005). A phonetically-based model of phonological vowel reduction. ms. MIT. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galazzi-Matasci, E. & Pedoya, E. (1983). Et la pédagogie de la prononciation. Le français dans le monde, 180, 39-44. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gendrot, C. & Adda-Decker, M. (2007). Impact of duration and vowel inventory size on formant values of oral vowels: an automated formant analysis from eight languages. Proc. of the 16th Int. Cong. Phon. Sciences, Saarbrûcken, 1417-1420. [Google Scholar]
  12. Georgeton, L., Paillereau, N., Landron, S., Gao, J. & Kamiyama, T. (2012). Analyse formantique des voyelles orales du français en contexte isolé : à la recherche d’une référence pour les apprenants de FLE. Proc. of the 29th Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, Grenoble, 145-152. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gottfried, T. L. (1984). Effects of consonant context on the perception of French Vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 91-114. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hillenbrand, J., Clarke, C. M. & Nearey, T. M. (2001). Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 748-763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirsch, F., Sock, R., Roy, J.-P. & Canault, M. (2004). Perception anticipatoire catégorielle des voyelles arrondies du français. Proc. of the 25th Journées d’Etudes sur la Parole de l’Association Francophone de la Communication Parlée (JEP de l’AFCP), Fès. [Google Scholar]
  16. Klatt, D. H. & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Landron, S., Paillereau, N., Nawafleh, A., Exare, C, Ando, H. & Gao, J. (2011). Le corpus PhoDiFLE: un corpus commun de français langue étrangère pour une étude phonétique des productions de locuteurs de langues maternelles plurielles. Cahiers de Praxématique, 54-55, 73-86. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lefebvre, A. (1988). Les voyelles moyennes dans le français de la radio et de la télévision. La Linguistique, 24(2), 75-91. [Google Scholar]
  19. Léon, P. R. (1993). Phonétisme et prononciation du français. Paris: Armand Colin. [Google Scholar]
  20. Léon, P. R. & Léon, M. (2007). La prononciation du français. Paris: Armand Colin. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1773-1781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Manuel, S. Y. & Krakow, R. A. (1984). Universal and language particular aspects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Haskins Status Report on Speech Research, 77/78, 69-78. [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller, J. L., Grosjean, F., Mondini, M. & Dommergues, J.-Y. (2011). Dialect effects in speech perception: The role of vowel duration in Parisian French and Swiss French. Language and Speech, 54, 467-485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, L. J. (1981). Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In P. D. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the Study of Speech. NJ: Erlbaum, 39-73. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mok, P. P. K. (2011). Effects of vowel duration and vowel quality on vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Language and Speech, 54(4), 527-545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen, N. & Fagyal, Z. (2008). Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 1-27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paillereau, N. (2015a). Assessing the phonetic level in L2 vowels production with the VisuVo software: Case of Czech learners acquiring contrasts between French mid vowels e/ɛ, ø/œ and o/ɔ. Proc. of PTLC2105, London, 67-70. [Google Scholar]
  28. Paillereau, N. (2015b). Perception et production des voyelles orales du français par des futures enseignantes tchèques de Français Langue Etrangère (FLE). Unpublished PhD thesis, Sorbonne-Nouvelle University, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pustka, E. (2011). L’accent méridional: représentations, attitudes et perceptions toulousaines et parisiennes. Lengas, 69, 117-152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Riordan, C. J. (1977). Control of vocal-tract lenght in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 4998-1002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Stevens, K. N. & House, A. S. (1963). Perturbation of Vowel Articulations by Consonantal Context: An Acoustical Study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 6(2), 111-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vaissière, J. (1985). The use of allophonic variations of /a/ in automatic continuous speech recognition of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(1), S12-S12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaissière, J. (2007). Area functions and articulatory modeling as a tool for investigating the articulatory, acoustic and perceptual properties of the contrast between the sounds in a language. In P. S. Beddor, M. J. Solé & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental Approaches to Phonology (pp. 54-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vaissière, J. (2008). On acoustic salience of vowels and consonants predicted from articulatory models. Keynote paper presented at the 8th Phonetic Conference of China and the International Symposium on Phonetic Frontiers, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wioland, F. (1991). Prononcer les mots du français: des sons et des rythmes. Paris: Hachette. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wioland, F. (2005). La vie sociale des sons du français. Paris: L’Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zwicker, E. & Fastl, H. (1990). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.