EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 27 (2016) SHS Web of Conferences, 27 (2016) 10004 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Psycholinguistique et Acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162710004
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernandes-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the Topic-Focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica, 14(2), 1-19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H. (2011). languageR: Data sets and functions with “analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics.” R package version 1.4. Disponible à l’adresse : http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr, D. J., Levy R., Scheepers C., & Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bott, O., & Solstad, T. (2014). From verbs to discourse - a novel account of implicit causality. In B. Hemforth, B. Schmiedtova, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Psycholinguistics approaches to meaning and understanding across languages, Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics (pp. 83-109). Munich: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 16(5), 601-609. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80022-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns. PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carminati, M. N. (2005). Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy (Person > Number > Gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua, 115, 259-285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1996). Understanding anaphora: The role of superficial and conceptual information. In M. Carreiras, J. E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 241-274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  13. Costa, A. (2010). Referential chain’s processing. In A. França & M. Maia (Eds.) Papers in Psycholinguistics – Proceedings of the First International Psycholinguistics Congress of ANPOLL (pp. 291-311). Rio de Janeiro: Imprinta. [Google Scholar]
  14. Costa, A., Faria, I. H., & Kail, M. (2004). Semantic and Syntactic Cues’Interaction on Pronoun Resolution in European Portuguese. In A. Branco, T. McEnery and T. Mitkov (Eds.), DAARC 2004, Proceedings of 5th Discourse Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (pp. 45-50). Lisboa: Ed. Colibri. [Google Scholar]
  15. Drummond, A. (2010). Internet Based EXperiments (IBEX) (version 0.3). Disponible à l’adresse : http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/ [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferstl, E. C., Garnham, A., & Manouilidou, C. (2011). Implicit causality bias in English: A corpus of 300 verbs. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 124-135. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0023-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Filiaci, F. (2010). Null and overt subject biases in Spanish and Italian: a cross-linguistic comparison. In Borgonovo, C., Español-Echevarría, M. & Prévost, P. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium (pp. 171-182). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [Google Scholar]
  18. Filiaci, F., Sorace, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: a cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 825-843. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T., & Qian, T., (2013). Rapid Expectation Adaptation During Syntactic Comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077661 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fossard, M., & Rigalleau, F. (2005) Referential accessibility and anaphor resolution: the case of the french hybrid demonstrative pronoun celui-ci / celle-ci. In A. Branco, T. McEnery & R. Mitkov (Eds.). Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modeling (pp. 283-300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R Companion to Applied Regression (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  22. Frazier, L. (2012). Squib: Co-reference and adult language comprehension. Revista Do Programa De Pos-Graduacao Em Linguistica Da Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro, 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  23. de la Fuente, I., & Hemforth, B. (2013). Effects of Clefting and Left-Dislocation on Subject and Object Pronoun Resolution in Spanish. In J. Cabrelli Amaro et al. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 27-45). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [Google Scholar]
  24. de la Fuente, I., Hemforth, B., Colonna S, & Schimke, S. (sous presse). The role of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in pronoun resolution: A cross-linguistic overview. In A. Holler, C. Goeb, & M. Ellert (Eds.), Experimental Perspectives on Anaphora Resolution. Series “Linguistische Arbeiten”, de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  25. Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1985). On-line resolution of anaphoric pronouns: Effects of inference making and verb semantics. British Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 385-393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 231-255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5(3), 459-464. [Google Scholar]
  28. Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274-307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jegerski, J., VanPatten, B., & Keating, G. D. (2011). Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 33(2), 193-221. [Google Scholar]
  31. van Kampen, N. J. (2008). Anaphoric pronouns for topic devices. In V. Stojanovik & T. Marinis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Child Language Seminar 30 (pp. 67-77). Reading UK: University of Reading. [Google Scholar]
  32. Keating, G.D., VanPatten, B., & Jegerski, J. (2011). Who was walking on the beach? Anaphora resolution in Spanish heritage speakers and adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 193-221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H., & Elman, J. L. (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 25(1), 1–44. doi:10.1093/jos/ffm018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Luján, M. (1985). Binding properties of overt pronouns in null pronominal languages. In W. Eilfort, P. Kroeber & K. Peterson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 424-438). Chicago: University of Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  35. Luján, M. (1986). Stress and binding of pronouns. In A. Farley, P. Farley & K.-E. McCullough (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical theory (pp. 248-262). Chicago: University of Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  36. McKoon, G., Greene, S. B., & Ratcliff, R. (1993). Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1040-1052. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mertz, J., Amsili, P., & Hemforth B. (2015). Implicit causality bias in French: An inventory of 300 verbs. Manuscrit en préparation. [Google Scholar]
  38. R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Disponible à l’adresse: http://www.R-project.org/ (Version 3.0.0). [Google Scholar]
  39. Vonk, W. (1985). The immediacy of inferences in the understanding of pronouns. In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Eds.), Inferences in text processing (pp. 205-218). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.