Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 28, 2016
RPTSS 2015 – International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2015
Article Number 01059
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 15 June 2016
  1. Duggleby, J. How to be an online tutor. Gower Publishing, Ltd., (2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. Hughes, G. Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12 (3), 349-363. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. MacDonald, J. Blended learning and online tutoring: Planning learner support and activity design. Gower Publishing, Ltd., (2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. Bender, T. Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  5. King, F. B. A virtual student. Not an ordinary Joe. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 157–166. (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schank, R. Educational technology: The promise and the myth. World Bank, Human Development Network, Education Group, Washington, DC Processed, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  7. García-Peñalvo, F. J. ed. Advances in E-Learning: Experiences and Methodologies: Experiences and Methodologies. IGI Global, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Donnelly, R., ed. Applied e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. IGI Global, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krasnova, T., Vanushin, I. Blended Learning Perception among Undergraduate Engineering Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11 (1), 54-56 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Throne, K. Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning. London: Kogan Page Limited, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  11. Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. Temporal learning analytics visualizations for increasing awareness during assessment. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12 (3), 129-147 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 1-6. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  13. Nehme, M. E-learning and students’ motivation. Legal Educ. Rev. 20 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  14. Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237-253, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How to" be there" for distance learners (Vol. 18). John Wiley & Sons, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Martínez-Argüelles, M., Plana, D., Hintzmann, C., Batalla-Busquets, J., & Badia, M. Usefulness of feedback in e-learning from the students’ perspective. Intangible Capital, 11(4), 627-645, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. Espasa, A. Temporal and assessment dimension: characterization of feedback after assignments. eLearn Center Research Paper Series, 1, 17-29, (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.