Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 28, 2016
RPTSS 2015 – International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2015
Article Number 01069
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 15 June 2016
  1. M. Roco, W. Bainbridge, Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. NRC, Research Universities and the Future of America: Ten Breakthrough Actions Vital to Our Nation’s Prosperity and Security, Washington: The National Academies press (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. NRC, Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond, Washington: The National Academies press (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Etzkowitz, The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action, N.Y. & London: Routledge (2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Grebenshchikova, International Journal of Technoethics, 7(1), 77-84 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Illes, S. Bird, Trends in Neuroscience, 29(9), 511-517 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. L. Allen, N. K. Strand, Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(10), 549-551 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Schicktanz, M. Schweda, B. Wynne, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15(2), 129-139 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Ives, Bioethics, 28(6), 302-312 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Petersen, Social Science & Medicine, 9, 264-270 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ten H. Have, B. Gordijn, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 15(2), 99-101 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. X. Liu, Higher Education of Social Science, 7(3), 76-79 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Prainsack, A. Buyx, Bioethics, 26(7), 343–350 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Abelson, E. A. Blacksher, K. Li, S. Boesveld, S. Goold, Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), 4-30 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Grady, The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(1), 8-10 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Millum, B. Sina, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research, 9, 2-11 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Matar, S. Garner, J. Millum, B. Sina, H. Silverman, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research, 9, 12-23 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. M. Veatch, The Hastings Center Report, 2(3), 5-7 (1972) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. T. Engelhardt jr., The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd ed., New York, (1996) [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Chambers, The fiction of bioethics, London: Taylor&Francis Ltd. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  21. T. V. Mescheryakova, I. V. Melik-Gaykazyn, Scholae. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 9(1), 36-45 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Panahi, J. Watson, H. Partidge, Journal of Information Science, 12, 0165551515598883 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. R. G. Apresyan, TSPU Bulletin 1, 89-94 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Parens, Bioethics, 27(1), 28-35 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Munster, Art in the biotech era. Adelaide: “Experimental Art Foundation”, 14-21 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Gorbuleva, I. Melik-Gaykazyan, M. Melik-Gaykazyan, Sociological Studies, 4, 152-153 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.