Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2016 (ERPA 2016)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20163101009
Published online 05 September 2016
  1. Karaman, S., Yıldırım, S., & Kaban, A. Öğrenme 2.0 yaygınlaşıyor: Web 2.0 uygulamalarının eğitimde kullanımına ilişkin araştırmalar ve sonuçları. inet-tr’08 - XIII. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı Bildirileri 22-23 Aralık 2008 Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  2. Atıcı, B., & Yıldırım, S. Web 2.0 uygulamalarının e-öğrenmeye etkisi. Akademik Bilişim, 10, 10–12, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, G., Çelik, E. & Aydın, M. Bilgi grafiği (infografik) oluşturma sürecine yönelik öğrenci görüşleri, Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(4), (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. Flemming, M. L., & Levie, W. H. (Eds.). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, (1993). [Google Scholar]
  5. Krum, R. Cool Infographics: Effective Communication with Data Visualization and Design. John Wiley & Sons. NJ. USA, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams, F. M. Diversity, thinking styles, and infographics. In Proc., 12th International Conference of Women Engineers and Scientists, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  7. Schroeder, R. Interactive Info Graphics in Europe--added value to online mass media: a preliminary survey. Journalism Studies, 5(4), 563–570, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dick, M. Interactive Infographics and News Values. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 490–506 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lankow, J., Ritchie, J., & Crooks, R. Infographics: The power of visual storytelling. John Wiley & Sons., (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Meeusah, N., & Tangkijviwat, U. Effect of data set and hue on a content understanding of infographic. http://www.repository.rmutt.ac.th/xmlui/handle/123456789/1263 (Retrieved Date:: 20.01.2015), (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis, M., & Quinn, D. Visualizing text: The new literacy of infographics. Reading Today, 31(3), 16–18 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Smiciklas, M. The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Que Publishing, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. Cochran, W. G. Sampling Techniques (Third ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc, USA, (1977). [Google Scholar]
  14. Kish, L. Survey Sampling, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NY. USA, (1995). [Google Scholar]
  15. Vanichvasin, P. Enhancing the Quality of Learning Through the Use of Infographics as Visual Communication Tool and Learning Tool. Proceedings ICQA 2013 International Conference on QA Culture: Cooperation or Competition http://www.icqa2014.com/downloads/Proceeding_29.pdf#page=135 (Retrieved Date:19.01.2015), (2013). [Google Scholar]
  16. Zinonyev, A. Data visualization in political and social sciences. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.1188v1.pdf (Retrieved Date:20.01.2015), (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295–312 (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.