Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 30, 2016
5th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Article Number 00003
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20163000003
Published online 14 September 2016
  1. Allemand, M., Amberg, I., Zimprich, D., Fincham, F. D. (2007). The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in episodic forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26: 199–217 [CrossRef]
  2. Berga, G., Tiltiņa, I., Buša, I., Dūšelis, S., (2005) Laulību šķiršanas, laulību noturības un dzimstības veicinošo faktoru izpēte http://www.lm.gov.lv/upload/berns_gimene/bernu_tiesibas/petijums_lauiliba.pdf
  3. Besson J., Brault Y. (1995) Les trois formes. Manuel d‘enseignement de l'EFAPO, tome 4, 1995
  4. Čukurs, E., (2015) Intelekts. Grām: Psiholoǵija 1: Pamatjautājumi – teorijas un pētījumi. (K.Martinsones, A.Miltuzes red.) R: Zvaigzne ABC, 216–236
  5. Dolto F. (1997) Viss ir valoda. R: Preses nams
  6. Dūšelis, S. (2007). Partnerattiecību kvalitātes un intimitātes pakāpes saistība ar kopdzīves rūpju sfērām https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/10697?locale-attribute=de
  7. Field, D. (1988). Family Personalities. Harvest Heuse
  8. Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of porcupines: From attributing responsibility for forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 1–23 [CrossRef]
  9. Goltsova, E., Leshchenko, l. (2011), Factors of the Social Environment as Determinants of Marriage and Birthrates. Sociological Research, 50(6), 51–60 [CrossRef]
  10. Goulmens, D. (2001). Tava emocionālā inteliǵence. Rīga: Jumava
  11. Hill, E.W. (2001). Understanding Forgiveness as Discovery: Implications for Marital and Family Therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23, 369–384 [CrossRef]
  12. Kachadourian, L.K., Fincham, F., Davila, J. (2004). The tendency to forgive in dating and married couples: The role of attachment and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 11, 373–393 [CrossRef]
  13. McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L., Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336 [CrossRef]
  14. Molnar S., Kapitany B. (2002). Gyermekcentrikus érzelmek és egyéni célok, vágyak viszonya. Századvég, 25, 97–116
  15. Musick, K., Bumpass, L., (2012), Reexamining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 74.1: 1–18
  16. Neff, L. A., Broady, E. F. (2011), Stress resilience in early marriage: can practice make perfect? USA: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101(5), 1050–1067 [CrossRef]
  17. Rosowsky, E., King, K., Coolidge, F., Rhoades, C., Segal, D. (2012), Marital Satisfaction and Personality Traits in Long-Term Marriages: An Exploration Study. Clinical Gerontologist, 35 (2), 77–78 [CrossRef]
  18. Shiota, M., Levenson, R. (2007), Birds of a Feather Don't Always Fly Farthest: Similarity in Big Five Personality Predicts More Negative Marital Satisfaction Trajectories in Long-Term Marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 666–675 [CrossRef]
  19. Vinikor-Kaplan, D. (1973) Trends and Changes in Family Structure and Planning. Society and Welfare, 2: 51–63
  20. Zamotkina, J., Žarkovs, V. (2011) Faktori, kas ietekmē dzimstību Latvijā, Eiropā un pasaulē
  21. Анщреева, T. B., Толстова, A. B. (2001) Темперамент супугов и совместимость в браке. Formula Formula . СПб.
  22. Лищовская, H. (2009) Взаимоотношения супугов в незаре-гистрированном брак. Диссертащияю СПб. http://www.dissercat.com/content/vzaimootnosheniya-suprugov-v-nezaregistrirovannom-brake#ixzz3d48DiUW4
  23. Рукова, E. (1993) Сощиально-щемографические аспектю устоичивости брака. Диссертащии. Москва: ВАК http://economy-lib.com/sotsialno-demograficheskie-aspekty-ustoychivosti-braka#ixzz3d4XDXTZN
  24. Султанова, A. (2008). Сощиально-психологические особенности супружескои совместимости и благополучия в брачнюх отношениях: щиссертащия. СПб.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.