EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 34 (2017) SHS Web Conf., 34 (2017) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 34, 2017
The 17th Annual Conference of the Asian Academic Accounting Association (2016 FourA Conference)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 9
Section Corporate Finance and Capital Markets
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173403003
Published online 14 February 2017
  1. Baidori 2015, ‘Pengklasteran Pemerintah Daerah di Jawa dan Bali Berdasarkan Variabel Sosio ekonomi (Komparasi Laporan keuangan Daerah)’, Thesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, KW 1993, The 10-Point Test of Financial Condition: Toward an Esay-to-Use Assessment Tool for Smaller Cities. Government Finance Review, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  3. Creswell, JW 2014, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th Edition, Sage Publications, California. [Google Scholar]
  4. DJPK 2013, Analisis Realisasi APBD Tahun Anggaran 2012. Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan-Kementerian Keuangan. [Google Scholar]
  5. Direktorat Jenderal Angggaran (DJPK) 2015, Budget In Brief APBN 2015. Direkotrat Penyusunan Anggaran Republik Indonesia [Google Scholar]
  6. Hruza, F 2015, Public Sector Organization Financial Ratios Recent Development as a Metter of Financial Innovation. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, vol.12, no.2, pp. 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kioko, SN 2013, Reporting on the Financial Condition of the States 2002-2010. Jurnal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, vo.25, no.1, pp165–198. [Google Scholar]
  8. Maher, CS, dan Nollenberger, K 2009. Revisiting Kenneth Brown’s “10-Point Test.” Government Finance Review, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  9. Maher, CS 2013, Measuring Financial Condition: An Essential Element of Management During Periods of Fiscal Stress, The Journal of Government Financial Management, pp. 20. [Google Scholar]
  10. Prita, AD 2015. ‘Analisis Kondisi Keuangan Berdasarkan Model Brown’. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. [Google Scholar]
  11. Republik Indonesia 2005, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan. [Google Scholar]
  12. Republik Indonesia 2010, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2010 tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan. [Google Scholar]
  13. Republik Indonesia 2010, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2010 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang serta Kedudukan Keuangan Gubernur Sebagai Wakil Pemerintah di Wilayah Provinsi [Google Scholar]
  14. Republik Indonesia 2014, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ritonga, I, Clark, C, dan Wickremasinghe, G 2012a. Assessing Financial Condition of Local Government in Indonsia: An Exploration. Municipal and Public Finance, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–50. [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012b, “Factors Affecting Financial Condition of Local Government in Indonesia“: http://www.apira2013.org/proceedings/pdfs/K159.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ritonga, I 2014, Analisis Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah, Lembaga Kajian manajemen Pemerintah Daerah, Yogyakarta. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rivenbark, WC, Roenigk, DJ, Allison, GS 2010, Conceptualizing Financial Condition in Local Government, Jurnal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, vol.22, no. 2, pp. 149–177 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rivenbark, WC, dan Roenigk, DJ 2011, Implementation of Financial Condition Analysis in Local Government, Public Administration Quarterly, vol.35, no.2, pp. 241–267 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sugiyono 2015, Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development), Alfabeta: Bandung. [Google Scholar]
  21. Syahrudin 2006, Desentralisasi Fiskal: Perlu Penyempurnaan Kebijakan dan Implementasi [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, X, Dennis, L, dan Tu, YSJ 2007, Measuring financial condition: A Study of US states, Public Budgeting & Finance, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, X dan Liou, KT 2009, Assesing the Change in Financial Condition: An Anlaysis of Panel Data From U.S.States, Public Budgeting and Finance, vol.21, no.2, pp.165–197 [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams, DW 2003, Measuring Government in the Early Twentieth Century. Public Administration Review, vol.63, no.6, pp.643–659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zafra-Gomez, JL, Lopez-Hernandez, AM, Hernandez-Bastida, A 2009, Evaluating Service Quality and Minimizing the Effects of the Socioeconomic Environment: An Aplication to Spanish Municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration, vol.39, no.4, pp.425–449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Brusca, I, Rossi, FM, Aversano, N 2015, Drivers for the Financial Condition of Local Government: A Comparative Study Between Italy and Spain. Lex Localis- Journal of Local Self Government, vol.13, no.2, pp.161–184 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Crosby, A, dan Robbins, D 2013, Mission Impossible: Monitoring Municipal Fiscal Sustainability and Stress in Michigan. J.of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, vol.23, no.3, pp.522–555. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cabaleiro, R, Buch, B, Vaamonde, A 2012, Developing a Method to Assessing the Municipal Financial Health. American Review of Public Administration, vol.43, no.6, pp.729–751. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B, Mordan, N, Garcia-Sanchez, IM 2014, Is Local Financial Health Associated with Citizens Quality of Life? Soc Indic Res, vol.119, pp.559–580. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kloha, P, Carol, SW, dan Kleine, R 2005, Developing and Testing a Composite Model to Predict Local Fiscal Distress, Public Administration Review, vol.65, no.3, pp.313–323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Trussel, JM, dan Patrick, PA 2009, A Predictive Model of Fiscal Distress in Local Government, J. of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, vol.21, no.2, pp.578–616 [Google Scholar]
  32. Priyambodo, VK dan Ritonga, I 2014, Pengklasteran Pemerintah Daerah untuk Memaksimalkan Analisis Kondisi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVII. Mataram [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.