EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 36 (2017) SHS Web Conf., 36 (2017) 00014 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 36, 2017
The 2016 4th International Conference on Governance and Accountability (2016 ICGA)
Article Number 00014
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173600014
Published online 24 July 2017
  1. Abdullah, S. N., Mohamad, N. R., & Mokhtar, M. Z. (2011). Board independence, ownership and CSR of Malaysian large firms, Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(3),417–431. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, N. N. N., Sulaiman, M., & Siswantoro, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Malaysia: An analysis of annual reports of KLSE listed companies. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 11(1),51–86. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akbas, H. E., & Canikli, S. (2014). Corporate environmental disclosures in a developing country: An investigation on Turkish listed companies, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(2),50–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Mofleh, A., Taib, S., Mujeebu, M. A., & Salah, W. (2009), Analysis of sectoral energy conservation in Malaysia. Energy, 34(6),733–739. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amran, A., Ooi, S. K., Wong, C. Y., & Hashim, F. (2016). Business Strategy for Climate Change: An ASEAN Perspective, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(4),213–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arshad, R., Omar, H., & Othman, R., (2012). Corporate resources and environmental reporting practices in Malaysia, 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research Proceeding, 12-13 March. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development, Strategic Management Journal, 26(3),197–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1),99–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bassi, A. M., & Yudken, J. S. (2011). Climate policy and energy-intensive manufacturing: A comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of cost mitigation provisions in the American Energy and Security Act of 2009, Energy Policy, 39(9),4920–4931. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bassi, A. M., Tan, Z., & Mbi, A. (2012). Estimating the impact of investing in a resource efficient, resilient global energy-intensive manufacturing industry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1),69–84. [Google Scholar]
  11. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006), Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives, Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2),111–132. [Google Scholar]
  12. Buniamin, S. (2010). The quantity and quality of environmental reporting in annual report of public listed companies in Malaysia. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 4(2),115–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Buniamin, S., Alrazi, B., Johari, N.H., & Abd. Rahman, N.R. (2008). An investigation of the association between corporate governance and environmental reporting in Malaysia, Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 1(2),65–88. [Google Scholar]
  14. Campana, F., Bianchi, M., Branchini, L., De Pascale, A., Peretto, A., Baresi, M., & Vescovo, R. (2013). ORC waste heat recovery in European energy intensive industries: Energy and GHG savings, Energy Conversion and Management, 76, 244–252. [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell D., Craven B., & Shrives P., (2003), Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 16, 558–591. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao, Y., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2012). Does company reputation matter for financial reporting quality? Evidence from restatements, Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3),956–990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. (2001). Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay, Academy of Management Journal, 44(3),493–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4),303–327. [Google Scholar]
  19. Darus, F., Mad, S., & Yusoff, H. (2014), The importance of ownership monitoring and firm resources on corporate social responsibility (CSR) of financial institutions, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 173–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances, Journal of Management, 26(1),31–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. De Aguiar, T. R. S., & Bebbington, J. (2014), Disclosure on climate change: Analysing the UK ETS effects, Accounting Forum, 38, 227–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Elsayed, K. (2006). Reexamining the expected effect of available resources and firm size on firm environmental orientation: An empirical study of UK firms, Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3),297–308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Field, A. (2013), Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.), SAGE Publications: London. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ienciu, I. A., Popa, I. E., & Ienciu, N. M. (2012). Environmental reporting and good practice of corporate governance: Petroleum industry case study, Procedia Economics & Finance, 3, 961–67. [Google Scholar]
  25. International Energy Outlook, (2014). World energy and economic outlook. Retrieved at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/world.html [Google Scholar]
  26. Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G. S. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India, Advances in Accounting, 30(1),217–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Levesque, M., Millar, D., & Paraszczak, J. (2014). Energy and mining–the home truths. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 233–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, L., Wang, J., Tan, Z., Ge, X., Zhang, J., & Yun, X. (2014). Policies for eliminating low-efficiency production capacities and improving energy efficiency of energy-intensive industries in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 312–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liddle, B., (2012). The importance of energy quality in energy intensive manufacturing: Evidence from panel cointegration and panel FMOLS. Energy Economics. 34, 1819–1825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin, B., & Xie, C. (2014). Reduction potential of CO2 emissions in China ׳ s transport industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 689–700. [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. C. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective, Accounting Research Journal, 26(1),6–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maneschijn, R., Vosloo, J.C., Pelzer, R. (2014). Effective multi-level energy reporting in South African industry, International Conference on the Industrial and Commercial Use of Energy (ICUE), 19-20 Aug. [Google Scholar]
  33. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3),477–509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mohamad Taha, M.H. (2013). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276763 [Google Scholar]
  35. Napp, T. A., Gambhir, A., Hills, T. P., Florin, N., & Fennell, P. S. (2014). A review of the technologies, economics and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industrie, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 616–640. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5),1245–1264. [Google Scholar]
  37. Othman, R. & Ameer, R. (2009). Corporate social and environmental reporting: Where are we heading? A survey of the literature. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6, 298–320 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Palamutcu, S. (2010). Electric energy consumption in the cotton textile processing stages. Energy, 35(7),2945–2952. [Google Scholar]
  39. Paramonova, S., Thollander, P., & Ottosson, M. (2015). Quantifying the extended energy efficiency gap-evidence from Swedish electricity-intensive industries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 472–483. [Google Scholar]
  40. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2014). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1),102–116. [Google Scholar]
  41. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability, Academy of management Journal, 40(3),534–559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Saidur, R., Masjuki, H. H., Jamaluddin, M. Y., & Ahmed, S. (2007). Energy and associated greenhouse gas emissions from household appliances in Malaysia, Energy Policy, 35(3),1648–1657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2010), Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia, Managerial Auditing Journal, 25, 591–613. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Saygin, D., Worrell, E., Patel, M. K., & Gielen, D. J. (2011). Benchmarking the energy use of energy-intensive industries in industrialized and in developing countries. Energy, 36(11),6661–6673. [Google Scholar]
  45. Slater, D. J., & Dixon-Fowler, H. R. (2009). CEO international assignment experience and corporate social performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3),473–489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Song, C., & Oh, W. (2015). Determinants of innovation in energy intensive industry and implications for energy policy. Energy Policy, 81, 122–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. International Energy Agency (2013). Southeast Asia Energy Look. Retrieved at https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/SoutheastAsiaEnergyOutlook_WEO2013SpecialReport.pdf [Google Scholar]
  48. Sulaiman M., Abdullah N., & Abdul Hamid, F. (2014), Determinants of environmental reporting quality in Malaysia, International Journal of Economics, Management, & Accounting, 22, 63–90. [Google Scholar]
  49. Suutari, V., & Mäkelä, K. (2007). The career capital of managers with global careers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(7),628–648. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Toms, J. S. (2002). Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: some UK evidence,The British Accounting Review, 34(3),257–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Toppinen, A., Li, N., Tuppura, A., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Corporate responsibility and strategic groups in the forest‐based industry: Exploratory analysis based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(4),191–205. [Google Scholar]
  52. Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues-reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5),667–681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wei, L. Q., & Ling, Y. (2015). CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: Evidence from China, Journal of Business Research, 68(6),1157–1165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992), Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource Management, Journal of Management, 18(2),295–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yol Lee, S., & Rhee, S. K. (2007). The change in corporate environmental strategies: a longitudinal empirical study, Management Decision, 45(2),196–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Yin, H. T., & Tam, C. M. (2012). Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information, Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3),309–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.