SHS Web Conf.
Volume 36, 2017The 2016 4th International Conference on Governance and Accountability (2016 ICGA)
|Number of page(s)||11|
|Published online||24 July 2017|
- Al‐Najjar, B., & Anfimiadou, A. (2012). Environmental policies and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 49–59. [CrossRef]
- Amran, A., Ooi, S. K., Nejati, M., Zulkafli, A. H., & Lim, B. A. (2012). Relationship of firm attributes, ownership structure and business network on climate change efforts: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(5), 406–414. [CrossRef]
- Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 339–354. [CrossRef]
- Bachoo, K., Tan, R., & Wilson, M. (2013). Firm value and the quality of sustainability reporting in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 23(1), 67–87. [CrossRef]
- Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. [CrossRef]
- Bassen, A., & Kovacs, A. M. M. (2008). Environmental, social and governance key performance indicators from a capital market perspective. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik(9/2), 182–192.
- Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Wang, C. C. (2013). Learning and the disappearing association between governance and returns. Journal of financial economics, 108(2), 323–348. [CrossRef]
- bin Abd. Rahman, S. A., binti Yusoff, R., & binti Wan Mohamed, W. N. (2009). Environmental disclosure and financial performance: An empirical study of Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 29(2), 46–58. [CrossRef]
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. [CrossRef]
- Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281.
- Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Rusticus, T. O. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors’ expectations. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 655–687. [CrossRef]
- Derwall, J. (2007). The economic virtues of SRI and CSR.
- Esa, E., & Anum Mohd Ghazali, N. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian government-linked companies. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 12(3), 292–305. [CrossRef]
- Fauzi, H. (2009). The Determinants of the Relationship of Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Conceptual Framework. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, Forthcoming.
- Feroz, E. H., Kim, S., & Raab, R. L. (2003). Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(1), 48–58. [CrossRef]
- Filbeck, G., Gorman, R., & Zhao, X. (2009). The “Best Corporate Citizens”: Are They Good for Their Shareholders? Financial Review, 44(2), 239–262. [CrossRef]
- Hawani Wan Abd Rahman, N., Mohamed Zain, M., & Hanim Yaakop Yahaya Al-Haj, N. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 181–201. [CrossRef]
- Homburg, C. (2001). Using data envelopment analysis to benchmark activities. International Journal of Production Economics, 73(1), 51–58. [CrossRef]
- Ihlen, Ø. (2008). Mapping the environment for corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, publics and the public sphere. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 135–146. [CrossRef]
- Koe Hwee Nga, J. (2009). The influence of ISO 14000 on firm performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 408–422. [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.-H., & Saen, R. F. (2012). Measuring corporate sustainability management: A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 219–226. [CrossRef]
- Ponnu, C. H., & Ramthandin, S. (2008). Governance and performance: Publicly listed companies in Malaysia. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 3(1), 35–53.
- Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2011). Looking for evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in an emerging market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 3(2), 165–190. [CrossRef]
- Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. management science, 59(5), 1045–1061. [CrossRef]
- Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
- Sinkin, C., Wright, C. J., & Burnett, R. D. (2008). Eco-efficiency and firm value. Journal of accounting and public policy, 27(2), 167–176. [CrossRef]
- Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(4), 33–46. [CrossRef]
- Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2001). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms. Greener Management International, 2001 (34), 94–111. [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.-K., Lu, W.-M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lai, H.-W. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the US telecommunications industry? Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 580–591. [CrossRef]
- Yeh, Q.-J. (1996). The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 980–988. [CrossRef]
- Zin, N. M., & Sulaiman, S. (2011). Government-linked Companies Blue Book (GLCs Blue Book) as a complement to Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in the Government-Linked Companies transformation program. Paper presented at the 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.