Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2017
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2017 (ERPA 2017)
Article Number 01080
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173701080
Published online 14 August 2017
  1. Yule, G. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: New York, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  2. Moghaddam, A. S., Yazdanpanah, L., and Abolhassanizadeh, V. The Analysis of Persian Address Terms Based on theTheory of Politeness. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 10(3), p55 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. Keshavarz, M. The role of social context, intimacy and distance in the choice of forms of address. International of the Soceity of Language, 148, 5–18 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun, F. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouto De Gruyter, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  5. Taavitsainen, I. and Jucker A. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, P., and Levinson, S. Politeness: Some language universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1987). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dunkling, L. A Dictionary of Epithets and Terms of Address. New york: Routledge, (1990). [Google Scholar]
  8. Afful, J. Address Terms among University Students in Ghana: The Case of Descriptive Phrases. The International journal of Language Society and Culture, 20, 50 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. Ervin-Tripp, S. Sociolinguistic Rules of Address. In J.B. Pride, & Janet Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (p.225–240). London: Penguin Education, (1970). [Google Scholar]
  10. Salihu H. The Sociolinguistics Study of Gender Address Patterns in the Hausa Society. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4 (1), (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. Mazzon, G. Pronouns and Normal Address in Shakespearian English. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker (Eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems (p. 223–250). Philadelphia: John Benjamines B.V., (2002). [Google Scholar]
  12. Esmae’li, S. Terms of Address Usage: the Case of Iranian Spouses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (9) 183–188 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  13. Hwang, S. Terms of address: in korean and American culter’s. International Communication studies 1(2).http://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/08-Shin-Ja-J.-Hwang.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, R. and Gilman, A. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (p.253–276). Massachusetts: MIT Press, (1966). [Google Scholar]
  15. Parkinson, D. Constructing the Social Context of Communication: Terms of Adress in Egyption Arabic. Berlin: Mouto De Gruyter, (1985). [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickey, E. Forms of address and terms of reference. J.Linguistics, 33, 255–274 (1997). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nevala, M. Inside and out. Forms of address in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century letters. Journal of historical pragmatics, 5(2): 271–296 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.