SHS Web Conf.
Volume 43, 2018The 4th International Research-to-Practice Conference Lighting Design – 2017 (LD-2017)
|Number of page(s)||22|
|Published online||18 April 2018|
- L. Scannell, R. Gifford, Defining Place Attachment: A tripartite organizing framework, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Choices, Values, and Frames, APA, 39(4), 341-350 (1984) [Google Scholar]
- S. Marks, J. Davis, Does User Participation Lead to Sense of Ownership for Rural Water Systems? Evidence from Kenya. World Development, 40(8), 1569-1576 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Reb, T. Connolly, Possession, Feelings of Ownership, and the Endowment Effect, Judgement and Decision Making, 2(2), 107-114 (2007) [Google Scholar]
- M. Strahilevitz, G. Loewenstein, The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects, Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 276-289, (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Baxter, M. Aurisicchio and P. Childs, A psychological ownership approach to designing object attachment, Journal of Engineering Design, 26 (4-6), 140-156 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Van Dyne, J. Pierce, Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Vandewalle, L. Van Dyne, T. Kostova, Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of its Consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Cupchik, J. Laszlo, Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1st ed., 53(4): 64-83. (1992) [Google Scholar]
- S, Schemel, F. Dohna, L. Schwendinger, Cities Alive: Rethinking the Shades of Night, (Foresight, Arup, 2015) [Google Scholar]
- M. Arefi, Non-place and placelessness as narratives of loss: Rethinking the notion of place, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 4, no. 2, 179-193 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. J. Lee, S.H.Ryu, A study on the development of the site-specific public art in public design, KSBDA, 14(20), 299 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- E. Sanders, P. Stappers, Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design, Codesign, 4(1), 5-18 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- J. Sharp, V. Pollock, R. Paddison, Just Art for a Just City: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration, Urban Studies, 42(5), 1001-1023 (2005) [Google Scholar]
- B. Kim, E. Xylakis, G. Triantafyllidis, Designing a Lighting Installation through Virtual Reality Technology- the Brighter Brunnshög case study, ArtsIT 2017, (to be published) [Google Scholar]
- N. Tannenbaum, J. Spradley, Participant Observation, Anthropological Quarterly, 53(4), 260 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lunds Kommun, TI3 (Holmbergs, 2012) [Google Scholar]
- J.W. Creswell, V. L. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (Sage, 2011) [Google Scholar]
- Stadsodling - Odla i Lund - Uppleva & göra - Lund, Lund.se. Retrieved 27 December, from https://www.lund.se/odlailund (2016) [Google Scholar]
- Lunds Kommun, Municipal facts (Scb.se, 2016) [Google Scholar]
- J. Billson, Conducting focus group research across culture, WeD, 27 (2006) [Google Scholar]
- S. Weber, Visual Image in Research, in J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues, (Sage, Los Angeles, 2008) [Google Scholar]
- D. Morgan, Focus groups as qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 1, 32-46 (1997) [Google Scholar]
- L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, J. Stuart, Picturing research (Sense, Rotterdam, 2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Kendall, K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Biometrika, 46(12), 265, (1959) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.