Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 45, 2018
7th International Conference on Local Knowledge (ICLK 2017)
Article Number 07002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Language, Literature & Media
Published online 12 June 2018
  1. Lin, Y.L., Lin, H.W. and Yang, Y.T. (2015). Players' Value Structure in Digital Games. [Google Scholar]
  2. Games and Culture, 1-28. [Google Scholar]
  3. McLaughlin, T., Smith, D., and Brown, I.A. (2010). A framework for evidence based visual style development for serious games. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, ACM (2010), 132–138. [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersen, E., Liu, Y., Snider, R., Roy, S., Zoran, P. (2011). Placing a Value on Aesthetics in Online Casual Games. In: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroux, L., Le Bigot,L. Vibert,N. (2013). Impact of the motion and visual complexity of the background on players' performance in video game-like displays. Ergonomics, 2013;56(12):1863-76. Doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.847214. Epub2013 Oct 30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerling, K. M., Birk, M., Mandryk, R. L., & Doucette, A. (2013). The Effects of Graphical Fidelity on Player Experience. MindTrek, 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, L., & Lee, K. (2014). The Study Of Learners ’ Preference For Visual Complexity On Small Screens Of Mobile Computers Using Neural Networks, Tojet: The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology 13(2), 168–180. [Google Scholar]
  8. Roslina, I. & Azizah, J. (2009). Educational Games (EG) Design Framework: Combination of Game Design, Pedagogy and Content Modeling. 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics 5-7 August 2009, Selangor, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  9. Keller, J. M. (2006). Motivation and performance. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (2 ed., pp. 82-92). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouvier, P., Lavoué, E., Sehaba, K., & George, S. (2013). Identifying learner’s engagement in learning games: A qualitative approach based on learner’s traces of interaction. In O. Foley, M. T. Restivo, J. O. Uhomoibhi, & M. Helfert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 339-350). SciTePress: Aachen, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  11. Uysal, A., & Yildirim, I. G. (2016). Self-Determination Theory in Digital Games. Gamer Psychology and Behavior, 123-135. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chun, M. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1407–1409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Silvia, P. J. (2001). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 270-290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. A., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koffa, K. (1935): Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chang, D., Dooley, L., & Tuovinen, J. E. (2002). Gestalt Theory in Visual Screen Design – A New Look at an Old Subject. In Proc. WCCE2001 Australian Topics: Selected Papers from the Seventh World Conference on Computers in Education, Copenhagen, Denmark. CRPIT, 8. McDougall, A., Murnane, J. and Chambers, D., Eds. ACS. 5-12. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang, D. and Nesbitt, K. (2006). Identifying Commonly-Used Gestalt Principles as a Design Framework for Multi-Sensory Display, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on SMC, Taipei, Taiwan. [Google Scholar]
  18. McCloud, S. 1994. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dondis, D.A. A. (1973). Primer of Visual Literacy. MIT Press Design Department. United States of America. [Google Scholar]
  20. Muller, J. (1979).Structural studies of Art Styles. In Cordwell, J.M. (Ed.), The Visual Arts: Plastic and Graphic. 139-212. Mouton Publishers. Great Britain. [Google Scholar]
  21. Frohardt, D. (1999). Teaching Art with Books Kids Love: Teaching Art Appreciation, Element of art, and Principles of Design with award-Winning Children's Books. Fulcrum Publishing. United States of America. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bragg, L. A. (2003). Children’s perspectives on mathematics and game playing. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunity (Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Geelong, (Vol. 1, pp. 160-167). Sydney: MERGA. [Google Scholar]
  23. Scoresby J., Shelton B. (2011). Visual perspectives within educational computer games: Effects on presence and flow within virtual immersive learning environments. Instructional Science, 39, 227-254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Medina, E. (2005), Digital Games: A Motivational Perspective, Proceedings of DiGRA 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. In CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1297-1300). New York, NY: ACM. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bouvier, P., Lavoue, E., & Sehaba, K. (2014). Defining Engagement and Characterizing Engagement - Behaviors in Digital Gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 45(4–5), 491–507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rozendaal, M. C., Keyson, D. V., de Ridder, H., & Craig, P. O. (2009). Game feature and expertise effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in game play. AI and Society, 24(2), 123–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Barnett, L. A. (1990) Playfulness: Definition, Design, and Measurement. Play and Culture, 3, 319-336. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lumby, J. (2011). Enjoyment and learning: Policy and secondary school learners’ experiences in England. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 247-264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Abdul, A. & Felicia, P. (2015). Gameplay Engagement and Learning in Game-Based Learning A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research [Google Scholar]
  31. Engestrom, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a test bench ¨ of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Squire, K. D. (2002). Video Games and Education: Designing learning systems for an interactive age. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.