Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 14
Section Discours, pragmatique et interaction
Published online 09 July 2018
  1. Comby, J.-B. (2015). La Question climatique. Genèse et dépolitisation d’un problème public. Paris: Raisons d’Agir. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fløttum, K. (2016). Linguistic Analysis Approaches for Assessing Climate Change Communication. In: Climate Science: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fløttum, K. (Ed.) (2017). The role of language in the climate change debate. New York/London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fløttum, K., Dahl, T. (2012). Different Contexts, Different 'Stories'? A Linguistic Comparison of Two Development Reports on Climate Change. Language & Communication 32 (1), 14-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hulme, M. (2013). Exploring Climate Change through Science and in Society, London, Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones, M.D., Shanahan E.A., McBeth, M.K. (eds.). (2014). The Science of Stories. Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  8. Krosnick, J.A., Holbrook, A.L., Lowe, L., Visser, P.S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77, 7-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krosnick, J. A., Villar, A. (2011). Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change 105, 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Communicating the Risks of Global Warming: American Risk Perceptions, Affective Images and Interpretive Communities". In S. Moser, S. & L. Dilling, (eds.), Creating a Climate for Change (pp. 44-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on Climate Change Communication Research and Practice in the Second Decade of the 21 st Century: What More Is There to Say? WIREs Climate Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.403 [Google Scholar]
  12. Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B. (2010). Theory and Language of Climate Change Communication. WIREs Climate Change 1, 97-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nisbet, M.C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment. Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: (21 mai 2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. Nisbet, M.C., Myers, T. (2007). The polls-trends. Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (3), 444470. [Google Scholar]
  15. Norgaard, K. M. (2006). "We don’t really want to know": Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment 19, 347-370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nølke, H., Fløttum, K., Norén, C. (2004). ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris : Kimé. [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural Topic Models for Open◻Ended Survey Responses. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4), 1064-1082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ryghaug, M., Sorensen, K. H., Nœss, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science 20, 778-795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steentjes, K., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Corner, A., Arnold, A., Böhm, G., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Ruddat, M., Scheer, D., Sonnberger, M., Tvinnereim, E. (2017). European Perceptions of Climate Change: Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Cardiff: Cardiff University. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stoneman, P., Sturgis, P., Allum, N. (2013). Exploring public discourses about emerging technologies through statistical clustering of open-ended survey questions. Public Understanding of Science 22, 850-868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Teigen, K. H. (2014). When very likely is not so likely. Nature Climate Change 4, 421-422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum, K. 2015. Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change. Nature Climate Change 5, 744–747. Doi:10.1038/nclimate2663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum K., Gjerstad, Ø., Johannesson, M.P., Nordø, Å. D. (2017). Citizens' preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions. Global Environmental Change 46, 34-41. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zaccai, E., Gemenne, F., Decroly, J.-M. (2012). Controverses climatiques, sciences et politique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Politiques. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.