Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 53, 2018
International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences (ICHSS 2018)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 12
Section Communication and Media
Published online 16 October 2018
  1. Adler, E., & Clark, R. (Eds.). (2011). How it’s done: An invitation to social research, 4th Edition. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alch, M. (2000), “The echo-boom generation: a growing force in American society”, The Futurist, Vol. 5, September, pp. 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ariyasriwatana, W., & Quiroga, L. M. (2014). A thousand ways to say “Delicious!”—Categorizing expressions of deliciousness from restaurant reviews on the social network site Yelp. Appetite, 104, pp. 18–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baird, C., & Parasnis, G. (2011). From social media to social customer relationship management. Strategy & Leadership, 39, pp. 30–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research and research agenda. Journal of Service Management Marketing, 24(2), pp.328–344. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, pp.105–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brosdahl, D.J. & Carpenter, J.M. (2011), Shopping orientations of US males: a generational cohort comparison, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, pp. 548–554. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucher, T. & Helmond, A. (2017). ‘The Affordances of social media platforms.’ In Burgess, J., Poell, T. & Marwick, A. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London & New York: SAGE Publications, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cvijikj, I. P., & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3, pp.843–861. DOI 10.1007/s13278-013-0098-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Desreumaux, G. (2014, January 3). The Complete History of Instagram. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  11. Dominick, J.R. (2011). The Dynamics of Mass Communication: Media in Transition (11th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  12. Donelle, L., & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2008). Health literacy and online health discussions of North American black women. Women & Health, 47(4), 71–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eventys Partners (2015, March 3). How to Use Hashtags Correctly Across Social Networks for Marketing. Retrieved August 28, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitzpatrick, E. (2016, January 29). The Surprise History Behind Instagram Flat Lay Shots. Retrieved August 28, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallagher, K (2017, May 23). Instagram Tops Facebook on Engagement. Retrieved August 30, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  16. Hiscott, R. (2013, October 8). The Beginner’s Guide to the Hashtag. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmberg, C., E. Chaplin, J., Hillman, T., & Berg, C. (2016). Adolescents’ presentation of food in social media: An explorative study. Appetite, 99, pp.121–129, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, pp.164–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). ‘Utilization of mass Communication by the Individual’. In J.G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publication Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  20. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1995). Between media and mass/the part played by people/the two-step flow of communication. Boyd-Barrett, Ch. Newbold (red.), Approaches to Media, London, 124–134. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kemp, S. (2017, January 24). Digital in 2017: Global Overview. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  22. Ku, Y.C., Chu, T.H. & Tseng, C.H. (2013). Gratifications for using CMC technologies: A comparison among SNS, IM and e-mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), pp. 226–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, C.S. & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), pp.331–329, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leong, L.Q., Ab Karim, M. S., Othman, M., Mohd Adzahan, N., & Ramachandran, S. (2010). Relationships Between Malaysian Food Image, Tourist Satisfaction and Behavioural Intention. World Applied Sciences Journal. (Special Issue of Tourism & Hospitality), 10, pp.164–171. [Google Scholar]
  25. Logan, K. (2016). Attitudes towards in-app advertising: a uses and gratifications perspective. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 15(1), pp.26–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Malaysian Digital Association (2016, August 3). 2016 Malaysia Digital Landscape. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  27. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commision (2016). Internet Users Survey 2016. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  28. Perception Media. (2015). Media Planning Guide Malaysia 2015. Kuala Lumpur: Perception Media. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mejova, Y., Abbar, S., & Haddadi, H. (2016). Fetishizing Food in Digital Age: #foodporn Around the World. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, pp.250–258. [Google Scholar]
  30. Muggleton, D. (2000). Inside subculture: The postmodern meaning of style. Oxford:Berg Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  31. Oh, S., Baek, H. and Ahn, J. (2015) ‘The effect of electronic word-of-mouth (WOM) on mobile application downloads: an empirical investigation’, International Journal of Mobile Communications, 13(2), pp.136–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Park, J. and Gursoy, D. (2012), “Generation effects on work engagement among US hotel employees”, International journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), pp. 1195–1202. [Google Scholar]
  33. Park, N., Kee, K.F. & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology Behavior, 12(6), pp. 729–733, DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perception Media. (2015). Media Planning Guide Malaysia 2015. Kuala Lumpur: Perception Media. [Google Scholar]
  35. Qualman, E. (2014). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  36. Raacke, J. & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking site. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), pp.169–174, DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056. [Google Scholar]
  37. University of Washington. (2017, April 26). Food photos help Instagram users with healthy eating. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 17, 2017 from [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, E. and Chou, N. (2016) ‘Examining social influence factors affecting consumer continuous usage intention for mobile social networking applications’, International Journal of Mobile Communications, 14(1), pp.43–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Uses and gratifications theory. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application, 392–98. [Google Scholar]
  40. Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. [Google Scholar]
  41. Williams, J. P., & Mohamed Nasir, K. (2016). Muslim girl culture and social control in Southeast Asia : Exploring the hijabista and hijabster phenomena. Crime Media Culture, (January), pp.1–18. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilson, T. (2012). What can phenomenology offer the consumer?:Marketing research as philosophical, method conceptual. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15(3), pp.230–241. doi: 10.1108/13522751211231969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wilson, T. (2016). Hermeneutics. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, pp.1–9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.