Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2018
International Conference on Leadership and Management (ICLM 2018)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 24
Section Agile Leadership & Preemptive Global Business Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185601003
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. Ahmad, A. (2009). Global ethics, environmentally applied: An Islamic view. In K. T. ip, Environmental Ethics: Intercultural Perspectives (pp. 93-114). Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baharuddin, A. (2012, January 3rd). Sustaining a natural balance: IKIM Views. The Star. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg, S. &. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new meta analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27:14-25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr, S. (2007). Factors Influencing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors : A U.K.Case Study of Household Waste Management. Environment and Behaviour, 39(4):465-473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chawla, L. (1999). Life Path Into Effective Environmental Action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1):15-26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. New Delhi: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  7. De Young, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behaviour, 18(4):435-449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Young, R. (2011). Slow wins: Patience, preserverance and behavior change. Carbon Management, 2(6):607-611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Young, R. (2013). Environmental psychology overview. In S. R. Klein, Green Organizations: Driving Change with IO Psychology (pp. 22-45.). New York : Routledge Academic. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dietz, T.;Fitzgerald, A. andShwom, R. (2005). Environmental Values. Annual Review Environmental Resources, 30:335-372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gallarza, M.; Saura, I. G.; Holbrook, M. (2011). The value of value: Further excursions on the meaning and role of customer value. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10: 179-191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guerin, D.,Crete, J., &Mercier, J. (2001). A Multilevel Analysis of the Determinants of Recycling Behavior in the European Countries. Social Science Research , 30, 195-218 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Halvorsen, B. (2012). Effects of norms and policy incentives on household recycling:An international comparison. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 67:18-26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holbrook, M. (1999). Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. New York:Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holbrook, M. B. (2006). Consumption experience, customer value and subjective personalintrospection: An illustrative photographic essay. Journal of Business Research, 59:714-725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khalid, F. M. (2002). Islam and The Environment. In T. Munn, Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change (pp. 332-339). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mashitoh Yaacob. (2009). The influence of contextual aspect of New Zealand muslim males’ environmentally ethical behaviour. New Zealand: The University of Waikato. [Google Scholar]
  18. Milfont, T.L. and Duckitt, J. . (2010). The Environmental Attitudes Inventory: A Valid and Reliable Measure to Asess the Structure of Environmental Attitudes . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30:80-94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mohamad, Z.F.;Idris, N. ;Baharuddin A.;Muhammad, A. ;Nik Sulaiman, N.M. (2012). The role of religious community in recycling: Empirical insights from Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 58:143-151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohamad, Z.F.;Idris, N. andBaharuddin, A. (2011). Religion and Waste. Waste Management, 31: 1905-1906. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mortazavi, S. (August 2004). Islamic economics: A solution for environmental protection. Trade, Growth and the Environment. UK: Oxford University. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nordlund, A. M. andGarvill, J. (2002). Value Structures Behind Proenvironmental Behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 34(6): 740-756. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. NST. (2012, January 15). Putrajaya retains top spot in recycling. New Straits Times. [Google Scholar]
  24. Osbaldiston, R. and Schott, J. P. . (2012). Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science:Meta Analysis of Pro-Environmental Behavior Experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2):257-299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ozdemir, I. (2003). Toward an understanding of environmental ethics from a Quranic Perspective. In R. Foltz, & F. a. Denny, Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Thrust (pp. 3-29).Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Prestin, A.; Pearce. K.E. (2010). We care a lot: Formative research for a social marketing campaign to promote school-based recycling. Conservation and Recycling, 54(11):1017-1026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Saphores, J.M.; Ogunseitan, O. A. and Shapiro, A.A. (2012). Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: An analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of U.S. households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 60:49-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21:327-339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schultz, P.W. andZelenzy, L. (1999). Values as Predictors of Environmental Attitudes: Evidence for Consistency Across 14 Countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19:255-265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schwartz, H. S. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Psychology and Culture , http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116. [Google Scholar]
  32. Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative Influence in Altruism. In L. Berkowitz, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 221-279). New York: Academic. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith, J.B. &Colgate, M. (2007). Customer Value Creation: A Practical Framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1): 7-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stern, P. (2000). Towards a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50:65-84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stern, P. (2005). Understanding Individuals’ Environmentally Significant Behavior. ELR News and Analysis, 35:85-90. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stern, P. C. &Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues,50:65-84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang, Z.;Chen, X.; Luo, J. (2011). Determining Socio-Psychological Drivers for Rural Household Recycling Behavior in Developing Countries : A Case Study From Wugan, Hunan, China. Environment and Behavior, 43(6): 848-877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson, S. C. G. &Barton, M.A. . (1994). Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes Towards the Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14:149-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Torgler, A.,Valinas, M., &Macintyre, A. (2008). Environmental Participation and. Climate Change Modelling and Policy. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. [Google Scholar]
  40. Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualizing ’value for the customer’: An attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12. [Google Scholar]
  41. Woodruff, R. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2):139-153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ziethaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 2-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.