EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 56 (2018) 05001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2018
International Conference on Leadership and Management (ICLM 2018)
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Preemptive Global Business Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185605001
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. Aigbogun, O.,Ghazali, Z., &Razali, R. (2014). A Framework to Enhance Supply Chain Resilience: The case of Malaysian Pharmaceutical Industry. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 6(3), 219-229 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aigbogun, O.,Ghazali, Z., &Razali, R. (2016). The Mediating impact of Halal logistics on supply chain resilience: An agency perspective. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(S4), 209-216. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aigbogun, O.,Ghazali, Z.,Razali, R. (2015). Resilience attributes of Halal logistics on the pharmaceutical supply chain. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 7(3), 34-43. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barroso, A.P.,Machado, V.H., &Cruz, M.V (2010). Toward a resilient supply chain with supply disturbances. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE IEEM [Google Scholar]
  5. Boone, H. N., &Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of extension, 50(2), 1-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chowdhury, M.M.H. &Quaddus, M.A. (2016). A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: the case of garment industry of Bangladesh. Omega, 57(1), 5-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Christopher, M &Peck, H. (2004). Building the rsilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), pp. 1-13 [Google Scholar]
  8. Enyinda, CI,Mbah, CHN &Ogbuehi A. (2009). An empirical analysis of risk mitigation in the pharmaceutical industry supply chain. J. Afr. Business 10: 218-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Erol, O.,Sauser, B.J. &Mansouri, M. (2010). A framework for investigation into extended enterprise resilience, Enterprise Information Systems, 4(2), 111-136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fakoor, A. M.,Olfat, L.,Feizi, K., &Amiri, M. (2013). A method for measuring supply chain resilience in the automobile industry. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(2), 537-544 [Google Scholar]
  11. Falasca, M.,Zobel, C.W. &Cook, D. (2008). A decisionsupport framework to assess supply chain resilience. Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, 596-605. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(2), 1-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fiksel, J.,Croxton, K.L. andPettit, T.J. (2015). From risk to resilience: learning to deal with disruption. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(2), 78-86. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hair, J.F.,Ringle, C.M. &Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jarvis, C.B.,MacKenzie, S.B. &Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. [Google Scholar]
  16. Juttner, U. (2005). Supply chain risk management: understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(1), 120-141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Krejcie, R. V., &Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ psychol meas. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ngah, A.H.,Zainuddin, Y., &Thurasamy, R. (2014). Adoption of Halal Supply Chain among Malaysian Halal Manufacturers: An exploratory Study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 388 – 395 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pal, R.,Torstensson, H. &Mattila, H. (2014). Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises – an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(1), 410-428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35: 210-232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pettit, T. J.,Croxton, K. L., &Fiksel, J. (2013). Ensuring supply chain resilience: development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(1), 46-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ponomarov, S.Y. &Holcomb, M.C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Raja, M. W.,Bodla, M. A., &Malik, S. A. (2011). Evaluating the effect of total quality management practices on business performance: A study of manufacturing firms of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(9). [Google Scholar]
  25. Rose, A. (2004). Defining and measuring economic resilience to disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management, 13(4), 307-314. [Google Scholar]
  26. Saifudin, A. M.,Othman, S. N., &Elias, E. M. Construct measurement for the new model of Islamic supply chain perspective. Proceedings of UMTAS 2016 [Google Scholar]
  27. Selim, N. I. I. B.,Zailani, S. H. B. D. M., &Aziz, A. A. B. (2018). Halal Logistics Service Quality (HLSQ) by Third-Party Providers (3PL) in Malaysia: A Conceptual Paper. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Halal Conference (INHAC 2016) (pp. 223-234). Springer, Singapore. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sheffi, Y. &Rice, B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). A grounded definition of supply risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5), 217-224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.