Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 58, 2018
GLOBMAR 2018 - Global Maritime Conference
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185801007
Published online 03 December 2018
  1. S. Saxon, S. Stone, Container Shipping, The next 50 years. McKinsey&Company. Travel, Transport & Logistics, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. L.A. Tavasszy, C.J. Ruijgrok, M.J.P.M. Thissen, Emerging global logistics networks: Implications for transport systems and policies. Growth and Change 34(4), 456-472, (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.P. Rodrigue, Transportation and Globalization. Encyclopaedia of Globalization, Edited by Roland Robertson and Jan Aart Scholte. Routledge (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. J.P. Rodrigue, Maritime Transportation: Drivers for the Shipping and Port Industries. International Transport Forum, Paris. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. L.D. Tyson, S. Lund, Globalization isn’t in retreat. It’s just gone digital. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/02/why-globalization-isnt-it-in-retreat-its-gone-digital, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. A.Bhattacharya, D. Khanna, C. Schweizer, A. Bijapurkar, The New Globalization: Going Beyond The Rhetoric. Boston Consulting, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. OECD/ITF, ITF Transport Outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789282108000-en, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Aggelakakis, M. Bernandino, P. Boile, A. Christidis, M. Condeco, A. Krail, M. Papanikolaou, J. Reichenbach. The Future of the Transport Industry. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Bernardino, J. Vieira, H. Garcia, Factors of evolution of demand and methodological approach to identify pathways. FUTURE Deliverable D3.1. Project financed by the 7th Framework Programme, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. K.M. Eisenhardt, Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550, (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R.B. Johnson, A.J. Onwuegbuzie, Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wilson, Marketing research: an integrated approach, FT Prentice Hall. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. C.R. Boddy, Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426-432, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Bryman, Social research methods, Oxford university press, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. N.K. Malhotra, Marketing research: An applied orientation, 5/e, Pearson Education India. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. T.L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T.L. Saaty, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281, (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. O.S. Vaidya, S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 1-29, (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Deng, Multicriteria Analysis with Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21, 215-231(1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353, (1965) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. C.S. Yu, A GP-AHP Method for Solving Group Decision-Making Fuzzy AHP Problems, Computers & Operations Research, 29(14), 1969-2001, (2002), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J.B. Sheu, A Hybrid Fuzzy-Based Approach for Identifying Global Logistics Strategies, Transportation Research, 40(1), 39-61, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Jain, Decision Making in the Presence of Fuzzy Variable, IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernet SMC, 6, pp. 698-703. (1976) [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Bortolan, R. Degani, A Review of Some Methods for Ranking Fuzzy Numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1-19, (1985) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  25. S.M. Baas, H. Kwakernaak, Rating and Ranking of Multiple Aspect Alternatives Using Fuzzy Sets, Automatica, 13, 47-58, (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. SJ. Chen, C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. In: Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 375. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Abdel-Kader, D. Dugdale, Evaluating Investments in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Fuzzy set Theory Approach. British Accounting Review, 33, 455-489 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Ezzati, T. Allahvıranloo, S. Khezerloo, M. Khezerloo, An Approach for Ranking of Fuzzy Numbers, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 690-695, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T.S. Liou, M.J. Wang, Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Integral Value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247-255, (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. C.K. Kwong, H. Bai, Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach. IEE Transactions, 35(7), 619-626, (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. DY. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. BSI, the British Standards Institution report, https://www.bsigroup.com/Documents/about-bsi/financial-performance/2016/BSI-Annual-report-and-financial-statements-2016.pdf (2016) [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Wienberg, Maersk Says June Cyberattack Will Cost It up to $300 Million. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-16/maersk-misses-estimates-as-cyberattack-set-to-hurt-third-quarter (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.