Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 64, 2019
14th European Architecture Envisioning Conference (EAEA14 2019)
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 12
Section Education
Published online 26 August 2019
  1. Rockcastle S. Annual Dynamics of Daylight Variability and Contrast A Simulation- Based Approach to Quantifying Visual Effects in Architecture. Andersen M, editor: London: Springer London : Imprint: Springer; (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. Treacy G, Innovative learning technologies for daylighting education. Professional Lighting Design Convention; Rome: VIA Verlag (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. Pallasmaa J. Encounters : architectural essays. MacKeith PB, editor. Helsinki: Helsinki : Rakennustieto Oy, (200) [Google Scholar]
  4. Storkerson P. Naturalistic Cognition: A Research Paradigm for Human-Centered Design . Journal of Research Practice. 6(2):M12. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. Holl S. Parallax. Basel: Basel : Birkhäuser; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawkes D. Environmental imagination. London: London : Routledge; (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. Lobell J. Between silence and light : spirit in the architecture of Louis I. Kahn. Kahn LI, editor: Boston ; London : Shambhala; (2008) [Google Scholar]
  8. Plummer H. Poetics of Light. A + U (Architecture + Urbanism) Extra Edition. (December no.12). (1987) [Google Scholar]
  9. Mardaljevic J. Book review: Daylighting handbook I. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. Cross N. Design thinking : understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg; (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Teal R. Dismantling the Built Drawing: Working with Mood in Architectural Design. International Journal of Art & Design Education. 29 (1): 8–16 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans R. Translations from drawing to building. AA files. (1986) [Google Scholar]
  13. Boyce PR, Smet KAG. LRT symposium ‘Better metrics for better lighting’ − a summary. Lighting Research & Technology; 46(6): 619–36. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tregenza P, Mardaljevic J. Daylighting buildings: Standards and the needs of the designer. Lighting Research & Technology. 50(1): 63–7 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harry Francis M. Embodiment and Enculturation: The Future of Architectural Design. Frontiers in Psychology. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. Pallasmaa J. Hapticity and time: Notes on fragile architecture. The Architectural Review. 207(1239): 78–84. (2000) [Google Scholar]
  17. Strelitz Z. Buildings that feel good. London: London : RIBA; (2008) [Google Scholar]
  18. Theodorson J. Teaching light − Constructing knowledge across multiple dimensions. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. Traverso G, editor. Modelling Daylight. Germany: VIA Verlag; (201). [Google Scholar]
  20. Carr N, Norvig P. Is Google Making Us Stupid? New York Times Upfront. 143 (3): 22. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  21. Mallgrave HF. The architect’s brain : neuroscience, creativity, and architecture. Wiley I, editor. Chichester, West Sussex, U. K. Malden, MA; Wiley-Blackwell (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gordon A. “Credit Swiss, ” Interview with Pierre de Meuron and Jacques Herzog. The Magazine from the Wall Street Journal. (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.