Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 71, 2019
Eurasia: Sustainable Development, Security, Cooperation – 2019
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 4
Section New Geopolitical Trends in Central Eurasia
Published online 25 November 2019
  1. United Nations, United Nations e-government survey 2018. Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies 2018 (2019). URL: Accessed: 16. 09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. A.J. Meijer, M.P.R. Bolivar, J.R. Gill-Garcia, From e-government to digital era governance and beyond: Lessons from 15 years of research into information and communications technology in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Virtual Issue, 1-6 (2018). URL: Accessed: 16.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Santiso, Will blockchain disrupt government corruption? Stanford Social Innovation Review (2018). URL: Accessed: 16.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. O.R. Ashaye, Z. Irani, The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253-270 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ministry of Digital Development, Telecommunications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation, In 2018, the audience of the state services mobile application almost doubled (2019). URL: 21.09.2019. [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Falco, R. Kleinhans, Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 17-20 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Sharma, Exploring best practices in public–private partnership (PPP) in e-government through select Asian case studies. The International Information & Library Review, 39(3-4), 203-210 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Microsoft, HealthVault (2019).URL: Accessed: 12.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. World Bank Group, Case studies on Pro-Poor PPPs (2018). URL: Accessed: 16.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Association for progressive communications, Pro-poor ICT access toolkit (2010). URL: Accessed: 21.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. L.A. Ivanovskaya, The implementation of public-private partnerships in the e-government projects based on the principle of "platform management". Gosudarstvenno-Chastnoye Partnerstvo, 3 (4),291-302 (2016). DOI: 10.18334/ppp.3.4.37089. [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  12. Government of UK, Healthcare: Public Private Partnerships (2013). URL: Accessed: 21.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Martins, L. Veiga, Innovations in digital government as business facilitators: Implications for Portugal. GEE Papers, 97 (2018). URL: Accessed: 15.09.2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. J.F. Yuan, A.P.C. Chan, W. Xiong, M.J. Skibniewski, Q.M. Li, Perception of residual value risk in public private partnership projects: Critical review. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(3), 15 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Veeramootoo, R. Nunkoo, Y.K. Dwivedi, What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35 (2),161-174 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Sandoz, J.-R. Eudes, R. Prévot, Public-private partnership in e-government: A case implementation. In P. Kropf, M. Benyoucef, H. Mili (Eds.), International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (pp. 203-211). IEEE: Los Alamitos (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.