Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 72, 2019
International Scientific Conference: “Achievements and Perspectives of Philosophical Studies” (APPSCONF-2019)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01016 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Philosophy of Science and Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197201016 | |
| Published online | 28 November 2019 | |
- V.I. Arnold, Huygens and Barrow, Newton and Hooke: Pioneers in mathematical analysis and catastrophe theory from evolvents to quasicrystals (Moscow, Nauka 1989) [Google Scholar]
- V.I. Arnold, What is Math? (MTsNMO, Moscow, 2008) [Google Scholar]
- E.M. Kakzanova, Linguo-cognitive and cultural peculiarities of scientific discourse (on the basis of mathematical and medical eponyms (Extended Abstract of D. Sc. Thesis, Moscow, 2011) [Google Scholar]
- R. Karnap, Psychology in Physical Language, Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 1, 126-146 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- A.A. Logunov, The Theory of Gravitational Field (Nauka, Moscow, 2001). [Google Scholar]
- A.A. Logunov, Henri Poincare and theory of relativity (Nauka, Moscow, 2004) [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Tselishchev, Philosophy of Mathematics (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 2002) [Google Scholar]
- G. Cabanac, Extracting and quantifying eponyms in full-text articles, Scientometrics, 98 (2014) [Google Scholar]
- R. Collins, The Sociology of Philosophies. A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (Massachusetts, and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998) [Google Scholar]
- J.A. Whitworth, Matteson, Should eponyms be abandoned? No, BMJ, 335, 7617 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- A. Woywodt, & E. Lawrence, Matteson, Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes, BMJ, 335, 7617 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.