EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 72 (2019) SHS Web Conf., 72 (2019) 04007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 72, 2019
International Scientific Conference: “Achievements and Perspectives of Philosophical Studies” (APPSCONF-2019)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Descriptors of Philosophical Epistemology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197204007
Published online 28 November 2019
  1. S.A. Azarenko, The topology of cultural reproduction (Publishing House of the Ural State University, Yekaterinburg, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. S.A. Azarenko, Russian philosophizing and topological philosophy in modern times, News of the Ural Federal University. Ser. 3, Social Sciences, 2 (103), 160-170 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. S.A. Azarenko, Topological philosophizing and social communication, Proceedings of Saratov University. New series. Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 16 (4), 412-417 (2016). DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2016-16-4-412-417. [Google Scholar]
  4. A.P. Alekseev, Philosophical text: ideas, argumentation, images (Progress Tradition, Moscow, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  5. M.L. Alekseeva, The problem of untranslability in philosophical studies of the beginning of the XXI century, Voprosy Filosofii, 3, 51-60 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. V.V. Bibikhin, Reading philosophy (Science, St. Petersburg,2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. N.A. Blokhina, The paradox of analysis and the paradox of analytical philosophy, Voprosy Filosofii, 3, 186-196 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. T.V. Vasilieva, The poetics of ancient philosophy (Academic project, Moscow, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. V.P. Vizgin, Toward an Update on the History of Philosophy: Thinking ad hoc, Philosophical Journal, 2 (11), 70-82 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. F.I. Girenok, Clip consciousness (Prospect, Moscow, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. A.A. Gryakalov, Topos and subjectivity. Evidence of approval (Science, St. Petersburg, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. M.I. Danilova, A.V. Sukhoverkhov, Biological and social foundations of the evolution of language and communication: modern discussions, Voprosy Filosofii, 12, 77-87 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. A.A. Enikeev, The methodology of topological analytics in the socio-humanitarian discourse of the twentieth century (historical excursus and problem statement), Cultural life of the South of Russia, 3 (54), 34-36 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. A.A. Enikeev, J. Deleuze, Stoicism and the birth of philosophical topology. Context in reflection: philosophy about the world and man, 7 (1A), 29-41 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Kurennoy, Notes on some problems of modern Russian history of philosophy, Logos, Philosophical and literary magazine, 3-4 (43), 3-29 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Kurennoy, Research and political cultural research program, Logos, Philosophical and literary magazine. 1 (85), 14-79 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. M.K. Mamardashvili, Full course of lectures. The philosophy of Europe. The psychological topology of the path (AST, Moscow, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Mayatsky, To the archeology of current and future practices of mastering a philosophical text: an antique commentary, Logos. Philosophical and literary magazine. 25 (6) 1-21 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. V.M. Mezhuev, Who needs philosophy today and why?, Philosophical Journal T, 2 (9), 5-16 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  20. B.I. Pruzhinin, N.S. Autonomova, T.V. Artemyeva, V.K. Kantor, I.A. Mikhailov, E.V. Pasternak, V.N. Porus, I.S. Razumovsky, L.T. Ryskeldieva, A.V. Smirnov., T.G. Shchedrina, V.V. Yantsen, Methodological problems of publishing philosophical texts, Materials of the conference - “round table”, Voprosy Filosofiii, 3, 5-50 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  21. M.F. Bykova, A.A. Guseinov, V.A. Lektersky, N.V. Motroshilova, Yu.V. Sineokaya, A.V. Smirnov, E.Yu. Soloviev, M.T. Stepanyants, Discussion of the project “Anatomy of Philosophy: How the Text Works.”, Voprosy Filosofii, 7, 109-146 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. V.I. Plotnikov, The variety of genres of philosophical discourse (Bank of cultural information, Yekaterinburg, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  23. V.A. Podoroga, What they ask when they ask, “What is philosophy?”, Philosophical Journal, 1 (2), 5-17 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  24. V.A. Podoroga, Metaphysics of the landscape. Communicative strategies in the philosophical culture of the XIX-XX centuries (Canon +, Moscow, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  25. M.A Pronin, B.G. Yudin, Yu.V. Sineokaya, Philosophy as an examination, Philosophical Journal, 10 (2), 79-96 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Rorty, Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres (Canon +, Moscow, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Rorty, Analytical and transformative philosophy, Philosophical Journal, 11 (3), 5-19 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. L.T. Ryskeldieva, About philosophical textology, or What history of philosophy can teach, Voprosy Filosofii, 1, 106-114 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. L.T. Ryskeldieva, Text culture as an object of historical and philosophical research, Philosophical Journal, 10 (1), 136-153 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. V.V. Savchuk, Topological reflection (Canon +, Moscow, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu.V. Sineokaya, Anatomy of philosophy: how the text works (Yask Publishing House, Moscow, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  32. A.V. Smirnov, Philosophy of translation and translation of philosophy, Philosophical Journal, 1 (8), 40-58 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  33. V.S. Stepin, I.T. Kasavin, Philosophical discourse: ten years later, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, T.XLI, 3, 18-52 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Hintikka, Philosophical studies: problems and prospects, Voprosy Filosofii, 7, 3-17 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  35. O.V. Khlebnikova, Classification of genres of philosophical literature, Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, 4 (56) T. 1, 201-207 (2013). DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2013-4-201-207. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.