Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2020
The 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the Global-Knowledge Economy
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Collaborative Economics and Digital Platforms
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207403007
Published online 10 January 2020
  1. Shared economy. Bencont Weekly Report. Not Inc33, 2017 Accessed from: https://www.bencont.sk/app/cmsSiteAttachment.php?ID=172&disposition=inline [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Sutherland, M. H. Jarrahi, The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328-341 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Belk, You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1596-1600 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Bardhi, M. Eckhardt, Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 881-898 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  5. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — A European agenda for the collaborative economy’. COM (2016) 356 final. Accessed from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16881 [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Muñoz, B. Cohen, A Compass for Navigating Sharing Economy Business Models. California Management Review. 114-147/2018 [Google Scholar]
  7. The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund the final evaluation (2014 2020) The European Commission. Accessed from: http://ec.europa.eu [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Bardhi, G. M. Eckhardt, Liquid Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 582–597 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Bardhi, G. M. Eckhardt, E. Arnould, Liquid Relationship to Possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 510–30 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Gill, A. Pratt, In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 1–30 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Kultalahti, K. Viitala, Generation Y – Challenging Clients For HRM? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 101-114 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Hershatter, M. Epstein, Millennials and the World of Work: An Organization and Management Perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 211-223 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Morgan, P. Nelligan, Labile Labour – Gender, Flexibility and Creative Work. Sociological Review, 63, 66–83 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions launching a consultation on a European Pillar of Social Rights [COM (2016) 127 final]. Accessed from: www.eur-lex.europa.eu [Google Scholar]
  15. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Establishing a European Pillar of Social Rights. SWD (2017) 206 final. Accessed from: www.eur-lex.europa.eu [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Mamojka et al., Commercial Code. Long comment. 1st volume. (Eurokódex, Bratislava, 2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.