Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2020
The 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the Global-Knowledge Economy
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Collaborative Economics and Digital Platforms
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207403006
Published online 10 January 2020
  1. M. Jacob. Facial recognition gains grounds in Europe, among big-brother fears. (20 October, 2017) Available: https://www.euractiv.com/section/data-protection/news/facial-recognition-gains-grounds-in-europe-among-big-brother-fears/ [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Hodson. Walking barcodes. The Economist. The World in 2019, 123 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Khan. EU plans sweeping regulation of facial recognition. (22 August, 2019) Available: https://www.ft.com/content/90ce2dce-c413-11e9-a8e9-296ca66511c9 [Google Scholar]
  4. EDPB. Facial recognition in school renders Sweden’s first GDPR fine. (22 August, 2019) Available: https://edpb.europa.eu/news/national-news/2019/facial-recognition-school-renders-swedens-first-gdpr-fine_en [Google Scholar]
  5. European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119. [Google Scholar]
  6. ICO. Statement: Live facial recognition technology in King’s Cross. (15 August, 2019) Available: https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2019/08/statement-live-facial-recognition-technology-in-kings-cross/ [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Ravani. Oakland bans use of facial recognition technology, citing bias concerns. (17 July, 2019) Available: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-bans-use-of-facial-recognition-14101253.php [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Madianou. The biometric assemblage: surveillance, experimentation, profit, and the measuring of refugee bodies. Television & New Media 20, no. 6 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Nissenbaum, Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review 79, no. 1 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Stoycheff, J. Liu, K. Xu, W. Kunto. Privacy and the Panopticon: online mass surveillance’s deterrence and chilling effects. New Media & Society 21, no. 3 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. AI HLEG. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. (2019) Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai [Google Scholar]
  12. EDPB. Guidelines 3/2019 on processing of personal data through video devices. (2019) Available: https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/consultation/edpb_guidelines_201903_videosurveillance.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Leong, Facial recognition and the future of privacy: I always feel like horizontal ellipsis somebody’s watching me. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75, no. 3 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. EDPS. Opinion 3/2018. EDPS Opinion on online manipulation and personal data. (2018) Available: https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/18-03-19_online_manipulation_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Schneier. Data and Goliath. The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company. 159-164 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Liang, V. Das, N. Kostyuk, M. M. Hussain. Constructing a data-driven society: China’s social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy and Internet 10, no. 4 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2019 on a comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics. (2019) Available: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0081_EN.html [Google Scholar]
  18. European Union. Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. OJ C 364 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Murray, F. Pete. Bulk surveillance in the digital age: rethinking the human rights law approach to bulk monitoring of communications data. Israel Law Review 52, no. 1 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A.F.T. Winfield, J. Marina. Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 376, no. 2133 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Ashrafi, J.P. Kuilboer. A comparative study of privacy protection practices in the US, Europe, and Asia. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy 12, no. 3 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W.G. Voss, A. H. Kimberly. Personal data and the GDPR: providing a competitive advantage for US companies. American Business Law Journal 56, no. 2 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Whitener, R. Aragon. How should we regulate facial-recognition technology? (29 January, 2019) Available: https://iapp.org/news/a/how-should-we-regulate-facial-recognition-technology/ [Google Scholar]
  24. California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, CAL. CIV. CODE § 1798.198(a) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Nemitz. Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 376, no. 2133 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.