Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2020
The 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the Global-Knowledge Economy
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Regions and Economic Resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207405005
Published online 10 January 2020
  1. P. Baláž, A. Hamara, G. Sopková, Konkurencieschopnosť a jej význam v národnej ekonomike (Zmeny a výzvy v období globálnej finančnej krízy). 1. ed. (Bratislava: Sprint dva, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Baláž, F. Margan, V. Ružeková, S. Zábojník, Energetická bezpečnosť v období globalizácie a jej vplyv na konkurencieschopnosť EÚ. 1st ed. (Bratislava: Sprint dva, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. J. Jaaskelainen et al. Finland’s Dependence on Russian Energy-Mutually Beneficial Trade Relations or an Energy Security Threat? Sustainability, 10, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Ikani, Change and Continuity in the European Neighbourhood Policy: The Ukraine Crisis as a Critical Juncture. Geopolitics, 24, 20-50 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Chernyak, Trends of International Energy Security Risk Index in European Countries. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 8, 5-32 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Pach-Gurgul, M. Ulbrych, Progress of the V4 Countries towards the EU’s Energy and Climate Targets in the Context of Energy Security Improvement (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Barnes, CEPS. NORD STREAM 2 – FRIEND OR ENEMY OF ENERGY SECURITY IN EUROPE? Available on: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/nord-stream-2-friend-or-enemy-energy-security-europe/. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Proedrou, Russian Energy Policy and Structural Power in Europe. Europe. Asia Studies, 70, 75-89 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Matveeva, Russia’s Power Projection after the Ukraine Crisis. Europe. Asia Studies, 70, 711-737 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Eser et al. Impact of Nord Stream 2 and LNG on gas trade and security of supply in the European gas network of 2030. Applied Energy, 238, 816-830 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Bilgin, Geopolitics of European natural gas demand: Supplies from Russia, Caspian and the Middle East. Energy Policy, 37, 4482-4492 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. ITC database. UNCTAD and WTO database. Data available at: http://www.intracen.org/. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Wachsmuth, The end of long-term contracts? Gas price and market dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe. 14th Internmational Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM 17). IEEE (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. J.S. Loe, Clash of Realities: Gazprom’s Reasoning on the EU Gas Trade. Europe-Asia Studies, 71, 1122-1139 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eurostat database. Energy statistics – quantities. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Ringel, M. Knodt, The governance of the European Energy Union: Efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the Winter Package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209-220 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Gotz, Nord Stream 2 The politicised pipeline (BWV-BERLINER WISSENSCHAFTS-VERLAG, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Snow, US sanctions necessary to stop Nord Stream 2 pipeline, speakers say. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 117, 30-31 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Semkou et al., Integrating Energy Markets in the Wider Europe: The Eastern Dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 101-113 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Tagliapietra, G. Zachmann, The Gazprom case: good timing or bad timing? Available on: http://bruegel.org/2015/04/the-gazprom-case-good-timing-or-bad-timing/. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Osieczko et al., Comparison of chosen aspects of Energy Security Index for the natural gas sector in Poland and Ukraine. (DE GRUYTER POLAND, 2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.