Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2020
The 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the Global-Knowledge Economy
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Economic Sustainability in Emerging Markets
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207406004
Published online 10 January 2020
  1. T. Dyllick, K. Hockerts, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11, 130 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. O.A. Kanaeva, Social imperatives of sustainable development. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies 34, 26 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Visser, D. Matten, M. Pohl, N. Tolhurst, The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Complete reference Guide to Concepts, Codes and Organisations (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Hoboken, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Visser, D. Matten, M. Pohl, N. Tolhurst, The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Complete reference Guide to Concepts, Codes and Organisations (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Hoboken, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. M.J. Epstein, M.-J. Roy, Making the business case for sustainability. Linking social and environmental actions to financial performance. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 9, 79–96 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J.A. Bernal‐Conesa, C. de Nieves Nieto, A.J. Briones‐Peñalver, CSR strategy in technology companies: Its influence on performance, competitiveness and sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24, 96–107 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Elkington, Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review 36, 90 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Steurer, M.E. Langer, A. Konrad, A. Martinuzzi, Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business‐Society Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 61/3, 263–281 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Dyllick, K. Hockerts, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11, 131 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Moon, The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development 15, 296–306 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Geissdoerfer, D. Vladimirova, S. Evans, Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 198, 401–416 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Joensuu, M. Makela, T. Onkila, Contradictory stakeholder expectations for sustainability reporting – a social contract theory approach. Social Innovation And Sustainable Entrepreneurship, 39-61 (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, The Lypiatt, 2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Moratis, F. Melissen, How do the sustainable development goals question rather than inform corporate sustainability? Resources Conservation And Recycling 141, 253-254 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Burke, R. Hoitash, U. Hoitash, The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 154, 1161-1186 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Schonborn, C. Berlin, M. Pinzone, C. Hanisch, K. Georgoulias, M. Minna, Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production And Consumption 17, 1-10 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K.Yu. Belousov, Evolution of views on the role of stakeholders in the development system of the company: the problem of existing stakeholders. Problems of the modern economy 4, 418-422 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Santos, F. Murmura, L. Bravi, SA 8000 as a tool for a sustainable development strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25, 95-105 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Romero, S. Ruiz, B. Fernandez‐Feijoo, Sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement in Spain: Different instruments, different quality. Business Strategy and the Environment 27, 221-232 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Amran, S.P. Lee, S. Devi, The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment 23, 217-235 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Braam, R. Peeters, Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: Diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25, 164-181 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M.J. Charlo, I. Moya, A.M. Muñoz, Sustainable development and corporate financial performance: A study based on the FTSE4Good IBEX Index. Business Strategy and the Environment 24, 277-288 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R.G. Eccles, M.P. Krzus, J. Rogers, G. Serafeim, The need for sector‐specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24, 8-14 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Kitsikopoulos, U. Schwaibold, D. Taylor, Limited progress in sustainable development: Factors influencing the environmental management and reporting of South African JSE‐listed companies. Business Strategy and the Environment 20, 1295-1301 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Whitehead, Prioritizing sustainability indicators: Using materiality analysis to guide sustainability assessment and strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment 26, 399-412 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. K.Yu. Belousov, Actual problems of the formation of a strategy for sustainable development of Russian companies. Problems of the modern economy 3, 191-194 (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.