Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 74, 2020
The 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the Global-Knowledge Economy
Article Number 06012
Number of page(s) 9
Section Economic Sustainability in Emerging Markets
Published online 10 January 2020
  1. C. Jona-Lasinio, S. Manzocchi, V. Meliciani. Knowledge based capital and value creation in global supply chains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Available at: (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Sigala, Mass customisation implementation models and customer value in mobile phones services: Preliminary findings from greece. Managing Service Quality, 16(4), 395-420 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Gancarczyk, J. Gancarczyk, J. Bohatkiewicz, SME roles in modular value chains: Perspectives for growth and innovativeness. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(3), 95-117 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Choi, R.-.B. Jean, D. Kim. The impacts of organizational learning capacities on relationship-specific innovations: Evidence from the global buyer–supplier relationship. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 1042-1066. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Davis-sramek, A. Omar, R. Germain. Leveraging supply chain orientation for global supplier responsiveness: The impact of institutional distance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(1), 39-56. (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Strange, J. Humphrey, What lies between market and hierarchy? Insights from internalization theory and global value chain theory. Journal of International Business Studies, Available at: (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Beverelli, V. Stolzenburg, R.B. Koopman, S. Neumueller. Domestic value chains as stepping stones to global value chain integration. World Economy, 42(5), 1467-1494 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Karasev, A.V. Beloshitsky, S.S. Trostyansky, and A.O. Krivtsova. National innovation systems: A case study of the leading developing countries. European Research Studies Journal, 21, 713-723. 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Graf, M. Kalthaus. International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness. Research Policy, 47(7), 1198-1214 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Messenni Petruzzelli, G. Murgia, 2019 University–Industry collaborations and international knowledge spillovers: a joint-patent investigation. Journal of Technology Transfer, Available at: (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Johansson, M. Karreman, A. Foukaki. Research and development resources, coopetitive performance and cooperation: The case of standardization in 3GPP, 2004–2013. Technovation, [online], Available at: (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Etzkowitz, E. Germain-Alamartine, J. Keel, C. Kumar, K. N. Smith, E. Albats, Entrepreneurial university dynamics: Structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 159-171 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Etzkowitz, C. Zhou, Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R and D Management, 48(1), 73-87 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Budylina. Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 265-277 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Champenois, H. Etzkowitz. From boundary line to boundary space: The creation of hybrid organizations as a Triple Helix micro-foundation. Technovation, 76-77, 28-39 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Law searching system. Available at: (application date 15.02.2019) [Google Scholar]
  17. Eurasian Economic Commission. Department of Industrial Policy. Comprehensive analysis of the state and development of the automotive industry of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. Moscow, 2016. 88p. [Google Scholar]
  18. Federal Custom Service. Available at: (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosstat. Available at: (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. World Input-Output Database. Available at: (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. AlmaGrid software. Available at: (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Nadanyiova, E. Kicova, The concept of BSC system in bus transport companies as a tool of modern management trends. In Globalization and its socio-economic consequences, Rajecke Teplice, Slovak republic, 477-484 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Spitsin, A. Mikhalchuk, N. Chistyakova, L. Spitsyna, I. Pavlova, Development of innovative industries in Russia under unfavourable external environment, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 13, 467–485 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Malkina, Spatial wage inequality and its sectoral determinants: The case of modern Russia, Oeconomia Copernicana 10, 69–87 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Popescu Ljungholm, Autonomous car regulation in the smart transportation infrastructure: Ethical issues, legal liabilities, and privacy concerns, Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 11, 7–12 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Slaby, Decision-making self-driving car control algorithms: Intelligent transportation systems, sensing and computing technologies, and connected autonomous vehicles, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 11, 29–35 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Bolton, V. Machova, M. Kovacova, K. Valaskova, The power of human–machine collaboration: Artificial intelligence, business automation, and the smart economy, Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 13, 51–56 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.