EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 82 (2020) SHS Web Conf., 82 (2020) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 82, 2020
SCAN’20 - 9e Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Building Information Modeling : Epistémologie de la conception architecturale numérique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208202001
Published online 09 November 2020
  1. Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M.M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections : Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baik, A. (2017). From point cloud to Jeddah Heritage BIM Nasif Historical House – case study. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 4, 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barazzetti, L., Banfi, F., Brumana, R., Gusmeroli, G., Previtali, M., & Schiantarelli, G. (2015). Cloud-to-BIM-to-FEM : Structural simulation with accurate historic BIM from laser scans. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Complete (57), 71-87. [Google Scholar]
  4. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruno, N., & Roncella, R. (2019). HBIM for conservation : A new proposal for information modeling. Remote Sensing, 11(15). [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruno, S., De Fino, M., & Fatiguso, F. (2018). Historic Building Information Modelling : Performance assessment for diagnosis-aided information modelling and management. Automation in Construction, 86, 256-276. [Google Scholar]
  7. d’Avezac de Castera, L. (2018). Atouts et enjeux du BIM pour les travaux dans l’existant à forte valeur patrimoniale. SFA - Le Bulletin, (54), 26-29. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dore, C., & Murphy, M. (2014). Semi-automatic generation of as-built BIM façade geometry from laser and image data. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 19, 20-46. [Google Scholar]
  9. García, E.S., García-Valldecabres, J., & Blasco, M.J.V. (2018). The Use Of Hbim Models As A Tool For Dissemination And Public Use Management Of Historical Architecture : A Review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(1), 96-107. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hochscheid, É., & Halin, G. (2018). L’adoption du BIM dans les agences d’architecture en France. SHS Web of Conferences, 47, 01009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, S.H. (2018). Assessing the needs and gaps of building information technologies for energy retrofit of historic buildings in the Korean context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5). [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, P.-C., & Su, H.-N. (2010). Investigating the Structure of Regional Innovation System Research through Keyword Co-occurrence and Social Network Analysis. [Google Scholar]
  13. López, F.J., Lerones, P.M., Llamas, J., Gómez-García-Bermejo, J., & Zalama, E. (2018). A Review of Heritage Building Information Modeling (H-BIM). Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(2), 21. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus : A Comparative Analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. [Google Scholar]
  15. Murphy, M., Mcgovern, E., & Pavia, S. (2009). Historic building information modeling (HBIM). Structural Survey, 27(4), 311-327. [Google Scholar]
  16. Murphy, M., McGovern, E., & Pavia, S. (2013). Historic Building Information Modelling – Adding intelligence to laser and image based surveys of European classical architecture. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 76, 89-102. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rolin, R., Antaluca, E., Batoz, J.-L., Lamarque, F., & Lejeune, M. (2019). From point cloud data to structural analysis through a geometrical hBIM-oriented model. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 12(2). [Google Scholar]
  18. Simeone, D., Cursi, S., & Acierno, M. (2019). BIM semantic-enrichment for built heritage representation. Automation in Construction, 97, 122-137. [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey : VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. Dans Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Éds), Measuring Scholarly Impact : Methods and Practice (pp. 285-320). Cham : Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  21. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2017). VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.6. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.