Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 83, 2020
Current Problems of the Corporate Sector 2020
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 7
Section Economics, Management and Finance
Published online 30 October 2020
  1. H. Landström, Informal investors as entrepreneurs: Decision-making criteria used by informal investors in their assessment of new investment proposals. Technovation, 18(5), 321-333 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Feeney, G. H. Haines Jr, A. L. Riding, Private investors’ investment criteria: insights from qualitative data. Venture Capital: An international journal of entrepreneurial finance, 1(2), 121-145 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Mason, M. Stark, What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227-248 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. S. Petty, M. Gruber, “In pursuit of the real deal”: A longitudinal study of VC decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 172-188 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. L. Maxwell, S. A. Jeffrey, M. Lévesque, Business angel early-stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 212–225 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Carpentier, J. M. Suret, Angel group members’ decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 808-821 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Granz, M. Henn, E. Lutz, Research on Venture Capitalists’ and Business Angels’ Investment Criteria: A Systematic Literature Review. In Contemporary Developments in Entrepreneurial Finance (pp. 105-136). Springer, Cham (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. K. Hsu, J. M. Haynie, S. A. Simmons, A. McKelvie, What matters, matters differently: a conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors. Venture Capital, 16(1), 1-25 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. K. A. Ericsson, Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge University Press (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. M. Mason, R. T. Harrison, Barriers to investment in the informal venture capital sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(3), 271-287 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Politis, The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(4), 399-424 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. E. Eesley, E. B. Roberts, Are You Experienced or Are You Talented?: When Does Innate Talent Versus Experience Explain Entrepreneurial Performance?. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 207-219 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Delmar, S. Shane, Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization, 4(3), 215-247 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. A. Baron, M. D. Ensley, Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management science, 52(9), 1331-1344 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Toft-Kehler, K. Wennberg, P. H. Kim, Practice makes perfect: Entrepreneurial-experience curves and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 453-470 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. O. Fiet, V. G. H. Clouse, W. I. Norton Jr, Systematic search by repeat entrepreneurs. Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behaviour, 1-27. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Haber, A. Reichel,. The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial process: The contribution of human capital, planning and environment resources to small venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 119-145. (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Grežo, R. Hanák, , Entrepreneur’s Experience And Venture Performance: A Meta-Analysis (under review) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Li, Y. Zhang, The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791-804 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. N. Kiss, S. Fernhaber, P. P. McDougall–Covin, Slack, Innovation, and Export Intensity: Implications for Small–and Medium–Sized Enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(5), 671-697 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Iversen, N. Malchow-Møller, A. Sørensen, Success in entrepreneurship: a complementarity between schooling and wage-work experience. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 437-460 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Laskovaia, G. Shirokova, M. H. Morris, National culture, effectuation, and new venture performance: global evidence from student entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 49(3), 687-709 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Shanteau, Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 53(2), 252-266. (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitteness, C. R., Baucus, M. S. Sudek, R. Horse vs. jockey? How stage of funding process and industry experience affect the evaluations of angel investors. Venture Capital, 14(4), 241-267 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Cassar, Industry and start-up experience on entrepreneur forecast performance in new firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 137-151 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. C. G. Brush, L. F. Edelman, T. S. Manolova, Ready for funding? Entrepreneurial ventures and the pursuit of angel financing. Venture Capital, 14 (2-3), 111-129. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Hanák, M. Grežo, The effect of prior entrepreneurial experience on the quality of a business plan proposal in applying for angel investment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing. ISSN print 1742-5360. (accepted for publication). (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.