Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 83, 2020
Current Problems of the Corporate Sector 2020
Article Number 01038
Number of page(s) 8
Section Economics, Management and Finance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208301038
Published online 30 October 2020
  1. K. A. Martire, B. Montgomery-Farrer. Judging experts: Australian magistrates´evaluations of expert opinion quality. Psychiatry psychology nad law. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Bugeja, RD. Rosa, T. Walter. Expert in Australian takeovers: Fees and quality. ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 41, 307-322 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Wolf. On the quality of forensic expert opinions from a penal perspective. Forensische psychiatrie psychologie kriminologie. 6. 235-242 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Bradáč, M. Kledus, P. Krejčíř. Soudní znalectví. 342 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Will. Experience with expert opinions (and experts). MKG-chirurg. 6. 269-274 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Ludolph. Cardil errors in expert opinions for the statutory accident insurance. Unfallchirurg. 118. 963-975 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Act no. 301/2005 Coll. Code of Criminal Procedure as amended [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmanska. The analysis of expert opinions´consensus quality. Information fusion. 34. 80-86 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. J. Bělohlávek, R. Hótová. Znalci v mezinárodním prostředí – v soudním řízení a trestním, v rozhodčím řízení a investičních sporech. 555 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Cunliffe. Independence, reliability and expert testimony in criminal trials. Australian journal of forensic sciences. 45, 284-295 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Musil, J. (2010). Hodnocení znaleckého posudku. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Edmond. Expert evidence in reports and courts. Australian journal of forensic sciences. 45. 248-262 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.