Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 87, 2020
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Teacher Professionalism: Psychological and Pedagogical Support of a Successful Career” (ICTP 2020)
Article Number 00076
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208700076
Published online 08 December 2020
  1. L.H. Bryant, J.R. Chittum, ePortfolio Effectiveness: An Ill-Fated Search for Empirical Support, International Journal of ePortfolio, 3 (2), 189-198 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Jafari, C. Kaufman, Handbook of Research on ePortfolios (Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Lombardi, To portfolio or not to portfolio: Helpful or hyped?, College Teaching, 56 (1), 7-10 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Struyven, Y. Blieck, V. DeRoeck. The electronic portfolio as a tool to develop and assess pre-service student teaching competences: Challenges for quality, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 40-54 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Cooper, T. Love, e-Portfolios in e-learning. In N.A. Buzzetto-More (Ed.), Advanced principles of effective e-learning, p. 267-292 (Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Barrett, Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: the REFLECT initiative, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50 (6), 436-449 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Moores, M. Parks, Twelve tips for introducing E-Portfolios with undergraduate students, Medical Teacher, 32, 46-49 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Clark, B. Eynon, E-portfolios at 2.0 – Surveying the field, Peer Review, 11 (1), 18-23 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Joyes, L. Gray, E. Hartnell-Young, Effective practice with e-portfolios: How can the UK experience inform implementation?, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (1), 15-27 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.D. Jenson, Promoting Self-regulation and Critical Reflection Through Writing Students’ Use of Electronic Portfolio, International Journal of ePortfolio, 1 (1), 49-60 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Chau, G. Cheng, Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (7), 932-950 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. M.K. Kabilan, M.A. Khan, Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: benefits, challenges and competencies gained, Computers & Education, 58 (4), 1007-1020 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D.U. Bolliger, C.E. Shepherd. Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses, Distance Education, 31 (3), 295-314 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Alexiou, F. Paraskeva, Inspiring key competencies through the implementation of an ePortfolio for undergraduate students, Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 197, 2435-2442 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Oliver, Graduate attributes as a focus for institution-wide curriculum renewal: innovations and challenges, Higher Education Research & Development, 32 (3), 450-463 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Thibodeaux, C. Cummings, D. Harapnuik, Factors that Contribute to ePortfolio Persistence, International Journal of ePortfolio, 7 (1), 1-12 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Bennett, K. Maton, L. Kervin, The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775-786 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P.A. Kirschner, P. DeBruyckere, The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. L.C. Morey, The personality assessment inventory. In Personality assessment, p. 193-240 (Routledge, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Rhodes, H. Chen, C. Watson, W. Garrison, Editorial: A Call for More Rigorouse Portfolio Research, International Journal of ePortfolio, 4 (1), 1-5 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. P.C. Abrami, H. Barrett, Directions for research and development on electronicportfolios, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.