Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 88, 2020
International Scientific Forum “Issues of Modern Linguistics and the Study of Foreign Languages in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (dedicated to World Science Day for Peace and Development)” (LLT Forum 2020)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Conference 1 - Fundamental Problems of Modern Theoretical and Applied Linguistics in an Interdisciplinary Aspect in the era of High Technologies
Published online 24 December 2020
  1. A.N. Kolmogorov, Three approaches on defining the ‘amount of information’ term Problems of Information Transmission, V. 1, № 1. 3–11 (1965) [Google Scholar]
  2. I.V. Oborneva, Automated complexity evaluation of academic texts based on statistical metrics : diss. … PhD thesis : 13.00.02. 165 p. Moscow (2006) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.I. Solnyshkina, E.V. Harkova, M.B. Kazachkova, The Structure of Cross-Linguistic Differences: Meaning and Context of ‘Readability’ and its Russian Equivalent ‘Chitabelnost’, in Journal of Language & Education, 6 (1), 103-119 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Nesi, Information density in a corpus of university student writing, in Proceedings of the International Conference CORPUS LINGUISTICS 2017. St Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. pp. 66-71 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. D.S. McNamara, A.C. Graesser, P.M. McCarthy & Z. Cai, Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 289 p (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.M. Nevdakh, Analysis of academic text’s informational features with the application of multivariate statistical analysis, in Applied Computer Science, Publ. by SEI “MFIU Synergy”, No. 4, p. 117-130 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.F. Shpakovsky, Assessment of perception difficulty and an academic text’s complexity optimization : (based on Chemistry academic texts): Diss. Abstract … PhD thesis in Philology, Minsk, 21 p (2007) [Google Scholar]
  8. J.P. Kincaid, Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Naval technical training command. Memphis, TN: Naval Air Station. 40 p (1975). [Google Scholar]
  9. V.V. Ivanov, M.I. Solnyshkina, V.D. Solovyev, Efficiency of text readability features in Russian academic texts. Komp’juternaja Lingvistika i Intellektual’nye Tehnologii. – Vol.2018-May, Is.17. pp.267-283 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. Corpus of Contemporary American English. URL: (Access: 21.10.2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. F. Zhuravlev, An experience of quantitative and typological investigation of spoken registers, in Varieties of urban spoken language: a collection of research articles – Raznovidnosti gorodskoy ustnoy rechi, Moscow, Nauka, pp. 84–150 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  12. O. B. Sirotinina, Spoken language within the system of functional styles of the Russian literary language: grammar, 3rd edition (Librekom, Moscow, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. H. Greenberg, “A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language, ” International Journal of American Linguistics, vol. 26 (3), pp. 178–194 (1960) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Biber, University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins Publishing Co. Amsterdam. 271 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  15. S.A. Stahl, Differential word knowledge and reading comprehension, in Journal of Reading Behavior, No. 15, pp.33-50 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Templin, Certain language skills in children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (1957) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. James R. Layton, “A Chart for Computing the Dale-Chall Readability Formula above Fourth Grade Level.” Journal of Reading, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 239–244. JSTOR (1980) (accessed 21 Oct. 2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. R.C. Anderson, P. Freebody, Vocabulary knowledge, in J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association (1981) [Google Scholar]
  19. Stenner 2001 Stenner, A. J. The Lexile Framework: A common metric for matching readers and texts. California School Library Journal, 25 (1), 41-42 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  20. S.A. Sharov, O.N. Lyashevskaya, An introduction to frequency dictionary for Russian frequency language. M.: Azbukovik, p. 21 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Zinsmeister, S. Birzer, D. Batinić, LeStCor: Levelled Study Corpus of Russian URL: (Access: 21.10.2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Solnyshkina, V. Solovyev, V. Ivanov & A. Danilov, Studying Text Complexity in Russian Academic Corpus with Multi-Level Annotation, in CEUR Workshop Proceedings V. 2303, International Workshop on Computational Models in Language and Speech, CMLS 2019. Kazan, Russia. pp. 1-11 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. R.V. Mayer, Assessing the complexity of academic text in natural sciences, in Modern Education, No. 4, pp. 56–64 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. V. Solovyev, M. Andreeva, M. Solnyshkina, R. Zamaletdinov, A. Danilov and D. Gaynutdinova, «Computing Concreteness Ratings of Russian and English Most Frequent Words: Contrastive Approach, « 2019 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), Kazan, Russia, pp. 403-408 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu, X., Li, J., 2020. Concreteness/abstractness ratings for two-character Chinese words in MELD-SCH. PLOS ONE.. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232133 June 22, 202013/ 16 [Google Scholar]
  26. A.M. Borghi, E. Zarcone, Grounding Abstractness: Abstract Concepts and the Activation of the Mouth. Front. Psychol. 7: 1498. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  27. L.N. Bogolyubov, L.F. Ivanova, N.F. Vinogradova, N.I. Gorodetskaya etc., Civics. 5-11 grades: Student’s Book, М.: Prosveshcheniye. (2012-2014) [Google Scholar]
  28. RusAC URL: (Access: 21.10.2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.