EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 91 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 91 (2021) 01024 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 91, 2021
Innovative Economic Symposium 2020 – Stable Development in Unstable World (IES2020)
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 10
Section Stable Development in Unstable World
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219101024
Published online 14 January 2021
  1. H. Nemeth Mazarova, Social responsibility in response to globalization and social responsibility programs in practice. Better Responsibility Initiative, 14 p. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Sroka, R. Szanto, Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics in Controversial Sectors: Analysis of Research Results. Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation, 14(3), 111-126 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Kunz, Corporate social responsibility. Prague: Grada Publishing (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Stonkute, J. Vveinhardt, W. Sroka, Training the CSR Sensitive Mind-Set: The Integration of CSR into the Training of Business Administration Professionals. Sustainability, 10(3), art. no.754 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Hitka, G. Pajtinkova-Bartakova, S. Lorincova, H. Palus, A. Pinak, M. Lipoldova, M. Krahulcova, N. Slastanova, K. Gubiniova, K. Klaric, Sustainability in marketing through customer relationship management in a telecommunication company. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 194-215 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Buriak, I. Voznakova, J. Sulkowska, Y. Kryvych, Social trust and institutional (bank) trust: Empirical evidence of interaction. Economics and Sociology, 12(4),116-129 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Myskova, P. Hajek, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Text of Annual Reports-The Case of the IT Services Industry. Sustainability, 10(11), art. no. 4119 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Lewicka-Strzalecka, Opportunities and Limitations of CSR in the Postcommunist Countries: Polish Case, Corporate Governance, 6, 440-448 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Pomering, S. Dolnicar, Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285-301 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Pavlik, M. Belcik. Corporate Social Responsibility – CSR in practise and how to proceed with it. Praha: Grada Publishing (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Kicova, A. Krizanova, Building a sustainable brand. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics: Advances in Applied Economic Research, pp. 367-379 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Lizbetinova, P. Starchon, S. Lorincova, D. Weberova, P. Prusa, Application of Cluster Analysis in Marketing Communications in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: An Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic. Sustainability, 11, art. no. 2302 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Vetrakova, M. Hitka, M. Potkany, S. Lorincova, L. Smerek, Corporate Sustainability in the Process of Employee Recruitment through Social Networks in Conditions of Slovak Small and Medium Enterprises. Sustainability, 10(5), art. no. 1670 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. McWilliams, D. Siegel, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Diacikova, A. Dankova, Green Marketing Communication. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference of the Poprad Economic and Management Forum, pp. 83-89 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Bratic, M. Palic, M.T. Lisanin, D. Gajdek, Green marketing communications in the function of sustainable development. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business – Research Advancements in National and Global Business Theory and Practice, pp. 185-198 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. E.P. Scholder, D.J. Webb, L.A. Mohr, Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Morsing, M. Schultz, Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 324-338 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  19. A.A. Bailey, A.S. Mishra, M.F. Tiamiyu, Application of GREEN scale to understanding US consumer response to green marketing communications. Psychology & Marketing, 35, 863-875 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Wagner, R.J. Lutz, B.A. Weitz, Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77-91 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. X. Luo, C.B. Bhattacharya, The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Marketing, 73, 198-213 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pontis – Focus. Perception of the concept and practices of socially responsible business by small and medium enterprises in Slovakia. [online], Available at: http://www.sbagency.sk/sites/default/files/sprava_csr_sme.pdf (2010). [Google Scholar]
  23. Mediaguru. Social media will be central for CSR. [online], Available at: https://www.mediaguru.cz/clanky/2015/06/pro-csr-budou-stezejni-socialni-media/ (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. B.P. Macfie, P.M. Nufrio, Applied Statistics for Public Policy. New York: M. E. Sharpe (2006). [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Rimarcik, Statistics for practice. Kosice: Marian Rimarcik (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. G.D. Ruxton, M. Neuhauser, When should we use one‐tailed hypothesis testing? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 114-117 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C.M. Lombardi, S.H. Hurlbert, Misprescription and misuse of one‐tailed tests. Australian Ecology, 34, 447-468 (2009). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.