Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 01037
Number of page(s) 9
Section Global Impact of COVID 19 on Economy and Society
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Castka, P., Searcy, C., Fischer, S. (2020). Technology-enhanced auditing in voluntary sustainability standards: The impact of COVID-19. Sustainability, 12(11), 1–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zimon, D., Dellana, S. (2019). A longitudinal exploratory study of ISO 9001 certification abandonment in small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 37(1), 53–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tröster, R., Hiete, M. (2018). Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes – A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1034–1043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. ISO ISO/IEC 17000:2004. Conformity assessment - Vocabulary and general principles. Iso 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuselman, I., Pennecchi, F., da Silva, R.J.N.B., Brynn Hibbert, D. (2017). Conformity assessment of multicomponent materials or objects: Risk of false decisions due to measurement uncertainty - A case study of denatured alcohols. Talanta, 164, 189–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kafel, P. (2015). Dobrowolna certyfikacja i znakowanie żywności; Kraków: Wydawnictwo UEK. [Google Scholar]
  7. Terziovski, M., Guerrero, J.L. (2014). ISO 9000 quality system certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 197–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sfakianaki, E., Kakouris, A.P. (2020). Obstacles to ISO 9001 certification in SMEs. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 31(13-14), 1544–1564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. ISO ISO/IEC 17021-3:2017. Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 3: Competence requirements for auditing and certification of quality management systems 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. ISO ISO/IEC 17065:2012. Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services. Iso 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. ISO ISO 19011:2018. Guidelines for auditing management systems. Iso-Iec Standards 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Coetzee, P., Lubbe, D. (2014). Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of risk-based internal audit engagements. International Journal of Auditing, 18(2), 115–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. van Asseldonk, M.A.P.M., Velthuis, A.G.J. (2014). Risk-based audit selection of dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(2), 592–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Messier, W.F. (2014). An approach to learning risk-based auditing. Journal of Accounting Education, 32, 276–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. International Accreditation Forum IAF MD 4:2018 IAF Mandatory Document for the Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Auditing/Assessment Purposes 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stoma, M., Dudziak, A., Rydzak, L. (2017). Wykorzystanie technik CAAT do podejmowania decyzji w procesie certyfikacji SZJ wg ISO 9001: 2015. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Seria: Organizacja i zarządzanie, 113. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pradhan, R.P., Mallik, G., Bagchi, T.P. (2018). Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: A causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Management Review, 30(1), 91–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Russell, James P., Wilson, S. (2013). Eauditing Fundamentals: Virtual Communication and Remote Auditing; Quality Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Castka, P., Corbett, C.J. (2016). Erratum to: Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. International Accreditation Forum IAF ID3 Informative Document For Management of Extraordinary Events or Circumstances Affecting ABs, CABs and Certified Organizations 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yin, R.K. (2012). Case study methods. In Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases : Opportunities and Challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 50(1), 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  23. Johansson, R. (2007). On case study methodology. Open House International, 32(3), 48–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kafel, P., Simon, A., Nowicki, P., Casadesús, M. (2017). Quality promises. Do companies follow a standard code of conducts model? The case of Spas. Humanities and Social Sciences quarterly, 24(3), 115-131. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stavros, C., Westberg, K. (2009). Using triangulation and multiple case studies to advance relationship marketing theory. Qualitative Market Research, 12(3), 307-320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.