Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 02044
Number of page(s) 9
Section Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. EC (2018) A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  2. Birner, R. (2018). Bioeconomy Concepts. In: Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy, 1st ed.; Lewandowski, I. (Eds.), Springer: Cham. [Google Scholar]
  3. EC (2012) Bioeconomy Strategy, “Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe”, COM (2012) 60 Final, Brussels. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J.J., Von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCormick, K.; Kautto, N. (2013) The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability, 5(6), 2589-2608. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Böcher, M., Töller, A. E., Perbandt, D., Beer, K., Vogelpohl, T. (2020). Research trends: Bioeconomy politics and governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kircher, M. (2019). Bioeconomy: Markets, Implications, and Investment Opportunities. Economies 2019, 7(3), 73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Potkány, M., Gejdoš, M., Debnár, M. (2018). Sustainable innovation approach for wood quality evaluation in green business. Sustainability, 10(9), 2984 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. The World Bank (2019). Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP) - Slovak Republic. The World Bank. [Google Scholar]
  10. Navrátilová, L., Výbošťok, J., Dobšinská, Z., Šálka, J., Pichlerová, M., Pichler, V. (2020). Assessing the potential of bioeconomy in Slovakia based on public perception of renewable materials in contrast to non-renewable materials. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 49(12), 1912-1924. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liobikiene, G., Chen, X., Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T. (2020). The trends in bioeconomy development in the European Union: Exploiting capacity and productivity measures based on the land footprint approach. Land Use Policy, 91, 104375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parobek, J., Paluš, H., Moravčík, M., Kovalčík, M., Dzian, M., Murgaš, V., Šimo-Svrček, S. (2019). Changes in carbon balance of harvested wood products resulting from different wood utilization scenarios. Forests, 10 (7), 590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Issa, I., Delbrueck, S., Hamm, U. (2019). Bioeconomy from experts’ perspectives - Results of a global expert survey. PLOS ONE 2019, 14 (5), e0215917. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jackson, R., Neto, A.B.F., Erfanian, E., Járosi, P. (2019). Woody Biomass Processing and Rural Regional Development. Economic Development Quarterly, 33(3), 234–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Favero, A., Mendelsohn, R. (2014). Using markets for woody biomass energy to sequester carbon in forests. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1(1-2), 75-95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Halaj, D.; Brodrechtová, Y. (2018). Marketing decision making in the forest biomass market: the case of Austria, Finland and Slovakia. Forest policy and economics, 97. 201-209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.