EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 92 (2021) SHS Web of Conf., 92 (2021) 04016 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 04016
Number of page(s) 7
Section Innovation and Investment on Industry 4.0
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219204016
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Jakimowicz, A., Rzeczkowski, D. (2019). Do barriers to innovation impact changes in innovation activities of firms during business cycle? The effect of the Polish green island. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(4), 631-676. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gallego-Álvarez, I., Pucheta-Martínez, M.C. (2020). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: a view from different institutional contexts. Eurasian Business review, early access. [Google Scholar]
  3. D’Aveni, R.A., Dagnino, G.B., Smith, K.G. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1371–1385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lendel, V., Varmus, M. (2011). Creation and implementation of the innovation strategy in the enterprise. Economics and Managemet, 16, 819-825. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kováč, M. (2007). Tvorba a riadenie inovácií. Košice: TU v Košiciach. [Google Scholar]
  6. Karz, B.R., Preez, N.D., Schutte, C.S. (2010). Definiton and role of innovation Strategy. Conference proceedings SAIIE 24 (pp. 60-74). Glenburn Lodge, Gauteng. [Google Scholar]
  7. Strecker, N. (2009). Innovation Strategy and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study of Publicly Listed Firms. Gabler Verlag. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wziątek-Kubiak, A., Balcerowicz, E., Pęczkowski, M. (2013). Differentiation of innovation strategies of manufacturing firms in the new member states: cluster analysis on firm level data. Argumenta Oeconomica, 31(2), 117-149. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zartha, J.W., Montes, H.J.M., Vargas, M.E.E., Velez, E.E., Hoyos, C.J.L., Hernandez, Z.R., Novikova, O. (2016). Innovaton strategy. Revista Espacios, 37(24). [Google Scholar]
  10. Schilling, M. (2013). Dirección estratégica de la innovación tecnológica. McGrawHill. [Google Scholar]
  11. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shell, C. (2002). Estrategias de negociación y comercialización de tecnología. En el marco del diplomado en convenio con IC2, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana y Colciencias. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pelser, T. (2014). The Affect of Innovation Strategies and their Connect to Company Performance. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 60-68. [Google Scholar]
  14. Porter, M.E., Ketels, C.H. (2003). UK competitiveness: Moving to the next stage. DTI Econ. Pap. 3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Freeman, C. (1974). La Teoría Económica de la Innovación Industrial. Madrid: Alianza Universitaria. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dobrovič, J., Urbański, M., Gallo, P., Benková, E., Čabinová, V. (2018). Balanced scorecard concept as a tool of strategic management and its usage in the construction industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 59 – 72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roliak, Y.A. (2013). A complex Approach to Evaluating the Innovation Strategy of a Company to Determine its Investment Attractiveness. In M. Ozsahin (Eds.), Proceedings of 9th International Strategic Management (pp. 562-571). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV. [Google Scholar]
  18. Franklin, C. (2003). Why Innovation Fails. Spiro Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dobrovič, J., Kmeco, L., Gallo, P., Gallo, P. Jr. (2019). Implications of the Model EFQM as a Strategic Management Tool in Practice: A Case of Slovak Tourism Sector, Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(18), 47-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Striteska, M. K., Prokop, V. (2020). Dynamic Innovation Strategy Model in Practice of Innovation Leaders and Followers in CEE Countries—A Prerequisite for Building Innovative Ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(9), art. no. 3918. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.