Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 05021
Number of page(s) 8
Section Collaborative Economics, Digital Platforms and Multimedia
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219205021
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Pindado, J., Requejo, I., de la Torre, C. (2012). Do family firms use dividend policy as a governance mechanism? Evidence from the Euro Zone. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 413-431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Saenz González, J., García-Meca, E. (2014). Does corporate governance influence earnings management in latin american markets? Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 419-440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Villalonga, B., Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: the role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647-691. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Almeida, Diniz Camargos, M., Goulard, L. (2018). Family-owned businesses and family-business dynamics. Qualitative research, 3(33), 64-83. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fang, H., Kotlar, J., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., De Massis, A. (2018). The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms: Generational differences and the role of knowledge‐ based resources. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 136-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vilčeková, L., Mucha, B., Peracek, T. (2018). Selected issues of family business in selected countries with emphasis on the Slovak Republic. Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference (pp. 129–138). Milan, Italy, April 26 – 28, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Evropský parlament 2015, Usnesení Evropského parlamentu ze dne 8. září 2015 o rodinných podnicích v Evropě (2014/221(INI). [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalls, S., and Probst, S. (2013) Familienunternehmen: gesellschafts- und zivilrechtliche Fragen. Wien: Manzsche Verlags. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: an introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103-1113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Labelle, R., Hafsi, T., Francoeur, C., Amar, W. B. (2018). Family firms’ corporate social performance: A calculated quest for socioemotional wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 511-525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Majocchi, A., Piscitello, L. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., De Massis, A., Wang, H. (2018). Reflections on family firm goals and the assessment of performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(2), 107-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Samara, G., Jamali, D., Sierra, V., Parada, M. J. (2018). Who are the best performers? The environmental social performance of family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 33-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Arzubiaga, U., Iturralde, T., Maseda, A., Kotlar, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in family SMEs: the moderating effects of family, women, and strategic involvement in the board of directors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 217-244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Molly, V., Uhlaner, L. M., De Massis, A., Laveren, E. (2019). Family-centered goals, family board representation, and debt financing. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 269-286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. (1998). Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: bayestheorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Operational Research, 46(4), 491-502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hwang, Ching-L, Lai, Young-J., Ting-Yun L. (1993). A New Approach for Multiple Objective Decision Making. Computers and Operational Research, 20(8), 889–899. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Machek, O. (2017). Rodinné firmy. C. H. Beck, Praha. [Google Scholar]
  21. Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 21-49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krzikallová, K., Tosenovsky, F. (2020). Is the value added tax system sustainable? the case of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Sustainability, 12(12), 4925. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. González, M., Guzman, A., Pablo, E., Trujillo, M. A. (2020). Does gender really matter in the boardroom? Evidence from closely held family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 221-267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Krajnak, M. (2019). Do selected tax advantages affect tax revenue from the personal income tax? Journal of Competitiveness, 11(4), 73-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Molly, V., Uhlaner, L. M., De Massis, A., Laveren, E. (2019). Family-centered goals, family board representation, and debt financing. Small business economics, 53(1), 269-286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.