Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Claims
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Ahn, B. I., Lee, H. (2010). An equilibrium displacement approach to oligopoly market analysis: an application to trade in the Korean infant formula market. Agricultural Economics, 41(2), 101–109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anders, S. M. (2008). Imperfect Competition in German Food Retailing: Evidence from State Level Data. Atlantic Economic Journal, 36(4), 441-454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Appelbaum, E. (1982). The estimation of the degree of oligopoly power. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2–3), 287–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azzam, A. M., Pagoulatos, E. (1990). Testing Oligopolistic and Oligopsonistic Behaviour: An Application to the US Meat-Packing Industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 41(3), 362–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakucs, L. Z., Ferto, I., Hockmann, H., Perekhozhuk, O. (2009) Market power on the edge? An analysis of the German and Hungarian hog markets, German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(8), 337-345. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergman, M. A., Brannlund, R. (1995). Measuring Oligopsony Power: An Application to the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 10(3), 307– 321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bettendorf, L., Verboven, F. (2000). Incomplete transmission of coffee bean prices: evidence from The Netherlands. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(1), 1– 16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhuyan, S. (2014). Visiting an old battleground in empirical industrial organisation: SCP versus NEIO. Applied Economics Letters, 21(11), 751–754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhuyan, S., Lopez, A. (1997). Oligopoly Power in the Food and Tobacco Industries, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3), 1035–1043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhuyan, S., Lopez, A. (1998). Oligopoly Power and Allocative Efficiency in US Food and Tobacco Industries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(3), 434–442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Čechura, L., Kroupová, Z., Hockmann, H. (2015). Market Power in the European Dairy Industry. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7(4), 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Y., Yu, X. (2018). Does the centralised slaughtering policy create market power for pork industry in China? China Economic Review, 50, pp. 59–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chidmi, B., Lopez, R. A., Cotterill, R. W. (2005). Retail oligopoly power, dairy compact, and Boston milk prices. Agribusiness, 21(4), 477–491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chirinko, R. S., Fazzari, S. M. (1994). Economic Fluctuations, Market Power, and Returns to Scale: Evidence from Firm-Level Data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 9(1), 47–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. European Commission (2009). Analysis of price transmission along the food supply chain in the EU, p. 69. [Google Scholar]
  16. Genesove, D., Mullin, W. P. (1998). Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry, 1890-1914. The RAND Journal of Economics, 29(2), 355–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hampel, F.R., Ronchetti, E.M., Rousseeuw, P.J., Stahel, W.A. (2005). Linear Models: Robust Estimation. Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 307–341. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hockmann, H., Vöneki, É. (2009). Collusion in the Hungarian Market for Raw Milk. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(1), 39-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hovhannisyan, V., Gould, B. W. (2012). A Structural Model of the Analysis of Retail Market Power: The Case of Fluid Milk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(1), 67–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ji, I., Chung, C. (2016). Assessment of Market Power and Cost Efficiency Effects in the U.S. Beef Packing Industry. Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumbhakar, S. C., Baardsen, S. and Lien, G. (2012) ‘A New Method for Estimating Market Power with an Application to Norwegian Sawmilling’, Review of Industrial Organization, 40(2), pp. 109–129. doi: 10.1007/s11151-012-9339-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lopez, A. (1984). Measuring Oligopoly Power and Production Responses of the Canadian Food Processing Industry Journal of Agricultural Economics, 35(2), 219–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lopez, A., Azzam, M. (2002). Market Power and/or Efficiency: A Structural Approach. Review of Industrial Organization, 20(2), 115–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lopez, A., He, X., Azzam, A. (2018). Stochastic Frontier Estimation of Market Power in the Food Industries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(1), 3–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lopez, A., You, Z. (1993). Determinants of oligopsony power: The Haitian coffee case. Journal of Development Economics, 41(2), 275–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lopez, A., Zheng, H., Azzam, A. (2015). Oligopoly Power in the Food Industries Revisited: A Stochastic Frontier Approach, AgEcon Search. Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  27. Mei, B., Sun, C. (2008). Assessing Time-Varying Oligopoly and Oligopsony Power in the U.S. Paper Industry. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 40(3), 927– 939. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mello, M. D., Brandao, A. (1999). Measuring the Market Power of the Portuguese Milk Industry. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(2), 209–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Merel, P. R. (2009). Measuring market power in the French Comte cheese market. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(1), 31–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Millán, J. A. (1999). Short-run equilibrium and market power in the Spanish food, drink and tobacco industries. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 229–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Murray, B. C. (1995). Measuring Oligopsony Power with Shadow Prices: U.S. Markets for Pulpwood and Sawlogs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(3), 486–498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Muth, M. K. and Wohlgenant, M. K. (1999). Measuring the Degree of Oligopsony Power in the Beef Packing Industry in the Absence of Marketing Input Quantity Data. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 24(2), 299–312. [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Donnell, C. J., Griffith, G. R., Nightingale, J. J., Piggott, R. R. (2007).Testing for market power in the Australian grains and oilseeds industries. Agribusiness, 23(3), 349– 376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Panagiotou, D. (2019). Market Power Effects of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in the U.S. Meat Industry: a Stochastic Frontier Approach Under Uncertainty. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 19(1), 103–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Panagiotou, D., Stavrakoudis, A. (2017). A Stochastic Production Frontier Estimator of the Degree of Oligopsony Power in the U.S. Cattle Industry. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 17(1), 121–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Panagiotou, D., Stavrakoudis, A. (2018). A stochastic frontier estimator of the aggregate degree of market power exerted by the US meat packing industry. Economia e Politica Industriale, 45(3), 387–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Perekhozhuk, O., Hockmann, H., Ferto, I., Bakucs, Z. (2013). Identification of Market Power in the Hungarian Dairy Industry: A Plant-Level Analysis. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 11(1), 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perekhozhuk, O., Glauben, T., Teuber, R., Grings, M (2015). Regional-Level Analysis of Oligopsony Power in the Ukrainian Dairy Industry. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 63(1), 43–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Perekhozhuk, O., Glauben, T., Grings, M., Teuber, R. (2016). Approaches and Methods for the Econometric Analysis of Market Power: A Survey and Empirical Comparison: Econometric Analysis of Market Power. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1), 303–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Salhofer, K., Tribl, C., Sinabell, F. (2012). Market power in Austrian food retailing: the case of milk products. Empirica, 39(1), 109–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Scalco, R., Braga, J. (2014). Measuring the Degree of Oligopsony Power in the Brazilian Raw Milk Market. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 17(2), 1-20. [Google Scholar]
  42. Scalco, R., Lopez, A., He, X. (2017). Buyer and/or seller power? An application to the Brazilian milk market. Applied Economics Letters, 24(16), 1173–1176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Silva, B. K. et al. (2019) ‘Assessing market power in the U.S. pulp and paper industry’, Forest Policy and Economics, 102, pp. 138–150. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.03.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stalgienė, A., Jedik, A. (2015). Oligopsony power in agricultural market: the case of the Lithuanian raw milk market. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 37(1), 114-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stiegert, K. W., Wang, S.-S., Rogers, R. T. (2009). Structural change and market power in the U.S. food manufacturing sector. Agribusiness, 25(2), 164–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Suzuki, N., Lenz, J. E., Forker, O. D. (1993). A Conjectural Variations Model of Reduced Japanese Milk Price Supports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(1), 210–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Swinnen, J. F. M., Vandeplas, A. (2010). Market power and rents in global supply chains. Agricultural Economics, 41, 109–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Weerahewa, J. (2003). Estimating Market Power of Tea Processing Sector. Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, 5, 69–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.