EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 92 (2021) SHS Web of Conf., 92 (2021) 06033 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 06033
Number of page(s) 10
Section Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Claims
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219206033
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Baldwin, R. & Wyplosz, Ch. (2013). Ekonomie evropske integrace. Praha: Grada Publishing, 584. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kniha ekonomie (2014). 1 vyd. Euromedia Group, edicia Universum, 352. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ministerstvo hospodárstva SR. (2020). Spolocnaá obchodna politika EU. Retrieved January 26, from: https://www.mhsr.sk/obchod/obchodne-vztahy-s-tretimi-krajinami/spolocna-obchodna-politika-eu. [Google Scholar]
  4. Repan, P. Dumping – cenove podvadzanie. Retrieved January 26, 2020, from:http://www.pce.sk/files/Dumping%20-%20cenové%20podvádzanie.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Associated Press. (2000). Ruling: US apple producers harmed; (5 edition). Journal of Commerce, New York. [Google Scholar]
  6. DC, (2007). Department of Commerce. International Trade Administration. Fact Sheet. [Google Scholar]
  7. Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (1991). International Economics, Theory and Policy, segunda edicion. Harper Collins Publishers, New York, 194, 2000-2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Majerova, I. & Nezval, P. (2011). Mezinarodni ekonomie v teorii a praxi. Brno: Computer Press, 357. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bi, Y. (2013). Is Dumping Still Harmful-New Thinking on Antidumping in the Global Free Trade. JE Asia & Int’l L., 6(1), 29-51. [Google Scholar]
  10. Felbermayr, G., & Sandkamp, A. (2020). The trade effects of anti-dumping duties: Firm-level evidence from China. European Economic Review, 122, 103367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hakobyan, S. (2018). Do Anti-dumping Duties Still Matter? The Curious Case of Aluminum Foil. World Trade Review, 17(4), 557-574.. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou, W. (2018). Appellate Body Report on EU− Biodiesel: The Future of China’s State Capitalism under the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement. World Trade Review, 17(4), 609-633. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Islam, R., Ghani, A. B. A., Othman, M. F., & Apandi, L. S. A. (2019). Political economy and its impact on international trade. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 651-660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bento, P. (2020). Competition, innovation, and the number of firms. Review of Economic Dynamics, 37, 275-298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nguyen, L. & Kinnucan, W.H. (2019). The US solar panel anti-dumping duties versus uniform tariff. Energy Policy, 127, 523-532. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schiavo, S., Tomasi, C., & Zhu, M. (2020). Anti-dumping activities against China: patterns and effects. Economia Politica, 1-24. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fan, H., Amber Li, Y., Xu, S., Yeaple, R.S. (2020). Quality, variable markups, and welfare: A quantitative general equilibrium analysis of export prices. Journal of International Economics, 125, 103327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kinzius, L., Sandkamp, A., & Yalcin, E. (2019). Trade protection and the role of non-tariff barriers. Review of World Economics, 155(4), 603-643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murphy, S., & Hansen-Kuhn, K. (2020). The true costs of US agricultural dumping. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 35(4), 376-390.. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, S. Y., & Spilker, G. (2019). Global value chains and the political economy of WTO disputes. The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 239-260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chandra, P., & Long, C. (2013). Anti-dumping duties and their impact on exporters: Firm level evidence from China. World development, 51, 169-186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jabbour, L., Tao, Z., Vanino, E., Zhang, Y. (2019). The good, the bad and the ugly: Chinese imports, European Union anti-dumping measures and firm performance. Journal of International Economics, 117, 1-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Irwin, M. D. A. (2005). The rise of US antidumping activity in historical perspective (Epub) (No. 5-31). International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nizovtsev, D., & Skiba, A. (2020). Non‐ equivalent pass‐ through of anti‐ dumping duties, countervailing duties and import tariffs. The World Economy, 43(1), 170-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.