EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 92 (2021) SHS Web of Conf., 92 (2021) 07030 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 07030
Number of page(s) 8
Section Regions and Economic Resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219207030
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Mazur, S., Kopyciński, P. (2018). Public Policy and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Babczuk, A., Kachniarz, M., Piepiora, Z. (2017). Work efficiency of local government. In P. Jedlicka, P. Maresova, J. Soukal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Conference on Hradec Economic Days, Vol 7(1), 2017 (pp. 20-28). Hradec Kralove: University of Hradec Kralove. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stigler, G.J. (1958). The Economies of Scale. The Journal of Law & Economics, 1, 54-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirsch, W. (1959). Expenditure Implications of Metropolitan Growth and Consolidation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(3), 232-241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyne, G. (1995). Scale, performance, and the New Public Management: An empirical analysis of local authority services. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 809-826. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Houlberg K. (2010). Municipal size, economy, and democracy. In: P. Swianiewicz (Eds.), Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe, Budapest: LGI – Open Society Institute. [Google Scholar]
  8. Faulk, D., Hicks, M. (2011). Local Government Consolidation in the United States. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Williamson, O. (1967). Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size. Journal of Political Economy, 75(2), 123-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Swianiewicz, P. (2010). If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution? An East European Perspective. Local Government Studies, 36(2), 183-203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Swianiewicz, P., Łukomska, J. (2017). Is Small Beautiful? The Quasi-Experimental Analysis of the Impact of Territorial Fragmentation on Costs in Polish Local Governments. Urban Affairs Review, 55(3), 832-855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Przybyła, K., Kachniarz M., Hełdak M. (2018). The Impact of Administrative Reform on Labour Market Transformations in Large Polish Cities. Sustainability, 10(8), 1-15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dollery B., Kitchen H., McMillan M., Shah A. (2020). Structural Reform: Municipal Mergers. Local Public, Fiscal and Financial Governance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Machimura T. (2016). Why Half the Municipal Governments Disappear Under a National Mergers Policy? Changing Local Bases in “Globalizing” Japan. In: E. Healy, D. Arunachalam, T. Mizukami (Eds.) Creating Social Cohesion in an Interdependent World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dollery, B.E., Drew, J. (2017). Chalk and Cheese: A Comparative Analysis of Local Government Reform Processes in New South Wales and Victoria. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(11), 847-858. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sancton, A. (2000) Merger Mania: The Assault on Local Government. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Walker R.M., Andrews R. (2013). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koprić, I., Wollmann, H., Marcou, G. (2017). Evaluating Reforms of Local Public and Social Services in Europe: More Evidence for Better Results (Governance and Public Management), Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J. (2018). Performance measurement and benchmarking as ‘reflexive institutions’ for local governments: Germany, Sweden, and England compared, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 543-562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Swianiewicz P, Gendzwill A., Zardi A. (2017). Territorial reforms in Europe. Does size matter? Brussels: Council of Europe, Centre of Expertise for Local Government Reform. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tavares A.F. (2018). Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review. Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies On Development, 22(1), 5-15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schwab, Ch., Bouckaert, G., Kuhlmann, S. (2017). The Future of Local Government in Europe Lessons from Research and Practice in 31 Countries. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
  23. Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., Serritzlew, S., Treisman, D. (2016). Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 812-831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gendźwiłł, A., Kurniewicz, A., Swianiewicz, P. (2020). The impact of municipal territorial reforms on the economic performance of local governments. A systematic review of quasi-experimental studies, Space and Polity, 1-20. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.